PostgresSQL the definitive relational DB
November 19, 2025
PostgresSQL the definitive relational DB

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with PostgreSQL
In my team, we primarily use PostgreSQL as a relational database for standard use cases, where we for example have some information that we want to keep track of but not having everything in a single table, choosing instead to build several relations between the tables. The other use case we have, which is the primary one, is the basis for our Airflow instances - this is something set up by default by Airflow but for us it is sometimes necessary to extract information from this DB for further processing.
Pros
- Query performance
- Automatic upgrades
- Retro compatibility
Cons
- Clearer indications on what is the query plan, to optimize the query
- More out of the box, Postgres specific, SQL functions
- It would be nice to have a more visual aid of the relationship between all tables, but possibly this depend more on the UI used
- 0% incidents due to maintenance - the only time was actually caused by an upgrade of two major versions we did
- When correctly used, the difference in query performance became 100 times faster (simply due to using indexes and PostgreSQL specific functions)
MySQL is an Oracle product which has in itself some known issues due to that (support, contract terms). Based on my knowledge, PostgreSQL support everything that MySQL support (syntax wise) and it adds more improvements and syntaxes that make the life of database engineers and anyone trying to use it much simpler and with a higher performance.
Do you think PostgreSQL delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with PostgreSQL's feature set?
Yes
Did PostgreSQL live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of PostgreSQL go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy PostgreSQL again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation