amazee.io presents a ZeroOps application delivery hub for engineering teams to deploy applications more easily. The developer-centric, open source platform aims to minimize the stress of managing infrastructure or operations. amazee.io supports organizations to accelerate their cloud and container adoption, along with providing managed Kubernetes for developer teams.
$199
per month
Heroku Platform
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
The Heroku Platform, now from Salesforce, is a platform-as-a-service based on
a managed container system, with integrated data services and ecosystem for deploying modern apps. It takes an app-centric
approach for software delivery, integrated with developer tools and
workflows. It’s three main tool are: Heroku Developer Experience (DX), Heroku
Operational Experience (OpEx), and Heroku Runtime.
Heroku Developer Experience (DX)
Developers deploy directly from tools like…
$85
per month
Pricing
amazee.io
Heroku Platform
Editions & Modules
Cloud Basic
$199
per month Every additional project $30 per month
Cloud Professional
$399
per month Every additional project $100 per month
Dedicated Cloud
Custom
Production
$25.00
per month
Advanced
$250.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
amazee.io
Heroku Platform
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
amazee.io
Heroku Platform
Features
amazee.io
Heroku Platform
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
amazee.io
-
Ratings
Heroku Platform
8.1
43 Ratings
3% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces
00 Ratings
7.626 Ratings
Scalability
00 Ratings
8.343 Ratings
Platform management overhead
00 Ratings
7.642 Ratings
Workflow engine capability
00 Ratings
8.429 Ratings
Platform access control
00 Ratings
7.142 Ratings
Services-enabled integration
00 Ratings
8.141 Ratings
Development environment creation
00 Ratings
8.738 Ratings
Development environment replication
00 Ratings
8.737 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification
00 Ratings
8.241 Ratings
Issue recovery
00 Ratings
8.438 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes
00 Ratings
8.443 Ratings
Best Alternatives
amazee.io
Heroku Platform
Small Businesses
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
AWS Lambda
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 9.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Code management and integrated of this tool with open source like GitHub file format will save the time which can be used in a effective way and helps to develop the solution for the better world. Also the scalability as per the increased load we have the option to increase the processing power as per the load
Heroku is very well suited for startups looking to get a server stack up and running quickly. There is little to no overhead when managing your instances. However, you'll need a background in basic DevOps or system management to make sure everything is set up correctly. In addition, it's easy to accidentally go crazy on pricing. Make sure you're only creating the server instances you need to run the base application and set up an auto-scaler plugin to handle peaks.
Heroku has a very simple deployment model, making it easy to get your application up-and-running with minimal effort. We can focus on our efforts the unique aspects of our application.
The robust add-on marketplace makes it easy to try out new approaches with minimal effort and investment -- and when we settle on a solution, we can easily scale it.
Heroku's support is quite good -- their staff is quite technical and willing to get into the weeds to diagnose even complicated problems.
Large price jumps between certain resource tiers (2x Dyno for $50 per month versus Performance Dyno for $250). Free Postgres next jumps to $50 per month.
Marketing/Branding to non-technical stakeholders. As the years pass, I've had to fight more to convince stakeholders on the value of Heroku over AWS.
Improve Buildpack documentation. This is one area where Heroku's documentation is fairly confusing.
Heroku is easy to use, services a ton of functions for you out of the box, and provides a means to get a software product off the ground and managed quickly and easily. The tools provide allows a small to medium size org to move very quickly. The CLI tools provided make managing an entire technical infrastructure simple.
Easy to use web based console and easy to use command line tools; deployment is done directly from a GIT repository. What more could you ask for? The one thing that keeps me from giving it a 10 is that custom build packs are almost incomprehensible. We used one for a while because we needed cairo graphics processing. Fortunately, I was able to figure out a different way to do what we needed so that we could get off the custom build pack.
Heroku availability correlates pretty strongly to AWS US EAST availability. We had a couple of times where there was a Heroku-specific issue but not for the last 7-8 months.
I've used it for many years without facing any major problem. It's not hard at all to get used to it, it's documentation is outstanding and simple. We are close to 2020 and I don't think most of the existing companies or startups should still face old problems such as wasting time deploying code and calculate computing resources.
Be ready to pay a bit more than expected in the beginning if you're migrating from a big server. The application is probably not ready for the change and you have to keep improving it with time.
It's also important to consider that you can't save anything to the disc as it will be lost when your application restarts, so you have to think about using something like S3.
There are multiple options in amazee that can be used in the product in terms of scalability and usage. Secondly this is much better product in terms of deploying the code as the same code can be used by the multiple applications by using the concept of load sharing. This helps in scalability of business
Heroku is the more expensive option for hosting compared to some of the cloud platforms we investigated, but it's worth it for us because of the plug-and-play nature of Heroku deployment. We can be up and running in a few minutes and know with precision how much it will cost us each month to run the application, unlike Amazon Web Services where you have to go to great pains to configure it correctly or else you might end up with a shocking monthly bill. Overall, spending the time to configure Amazon Web Services or one of its competitors is likely the more affordable and powerful choice, because you have control over so many specifics of the configuration. But it also requires the burden of continuing to maintain and update your AWS instance, whereas with Heroku they take care of security fixes and platform upgrades. It's a great service and we are happy to pay the extra cost for the value-adds Heroku provides.