Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs. Google App Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. | $0.04 per GB |
Google App Engine | Score8.4 out of 10 | N/A | Google App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages. | $0.05 Per Hour Per Instance |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Google App Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no minimum fee or setup charge. You pay only for the storage you use, for read and write access to data stored in Infrequent Access storage classes, and for any provisioned throughput. Amazon EFS offers four storage classes: two standard storage classes, including Amazon EFS Standard and Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA), and two One Zone storage classes, including Amazon EFS One Zone and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 92% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 92% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Google App Engine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.5 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.3 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 8.4 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |





