Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) vs. IBM Cloud Code Engine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon EKS
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed container service to run and scale Kubernetes applications in the cloud or on-premises, available on AWS or on-premise through Amazon EKS Anywhere.
$0.10
per month
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload…N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Code Engine
Editions & Modules
Amazon EKS Cluster
$.10
per hour of each cluster created
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon EKSIBM Cloud Code Engine
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Code Engine
Considered Both Products
Amazon EKS

No answer on this topic

IBM Cloud Code Engine
Chose IBM Cloud Code Engine
Code enigine is much easier to understand.
Chose IBM Cloud Code Engine
it is as good as them
Features
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Code Engine
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
8.9
1 Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Code Engine
6.6
15 Ratings
16% below category average
Scalability00 Ratings6.515 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings6.715 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Code Engine
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Code Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
6.7
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
6.3
(11 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Code Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
It is well suited when you want to have a Kubernetes cluster in AWS Cloud and want to avoid all the management overhead of maintaining your own cluster in terms of the control plane. EKS seems to be lacking in features when compared with AKS and GKE. Backups, service mesh, and monitoring have a lot of room for improvements.
Read full review
IBM
It would be a good solution for running serverless applications. Because infrastructure setup and maintenance expenses can be avoided, the investment will pay for itself. The time to value is short, allowing IT to respond to business demands quickly. It aided us in customizing security as well as operating a personal project using to autoscale up and down approach. Also, because there isn't much hassle, items can be pushed into production as soon as possible. Simply push a container, create an application, and you're ready to go. But, It is less suited when you have a static machine or need to keep data in some way and do not want to utilize network storage or a database.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Upgrade the kubernetes clusters to the latest version with a single click
  • Auto scaling policies to automatically scale the nodes
  • Detailed logs and events on the cluster within the EKS clusters portal, cloudwatch logs and metrics
Read full review
IBM
  • Managed Environment for partners and customers - shifting skills and speed to CSP
  • A variety of programming model support
  • Elastic scalability for cloud native development and speed
  • Flexible consumption model
  • Containerized workloads with horizontal scalability
  • Here is an example - live demo walk-thru delivered to partners and community:
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCBClYgpDFg
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • AWSIAM integration with Kubernetes RBAC could be better.
  • Enabling some add-ons like service mesh, and monitoring will be nice instead of having to install them yourself after the creation of the cluster.
  • EKS bootstrap time could be faster ...
Read full review
IBM
  • the pricing structure is complicated, and the servers are expensive. I really think they should offer better pricing options and support for more languages
  • sometimes the servers go down, and they take too long to respond to support tickets
  • uploading documents is slow since I have to do it one by one, making the process much longer than it should be
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
Since this capability supports a wide variety of use cases - all on non proprietary and open technology based frameworks
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Cluster maintanence is reduced, easier to deploy resources, great observability insights
Read full review
IBM
Consumers can purchase individual components as well as unlocking new bundles with special features and services including the extensive data management governance capabilities of the Automation range. Kubernetes containerizing for effective service implementation and an agile, flexible multi-cloud data program help both utilization expansion and deployment to be improved by this architecture.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and focusing on the wrong things. EKS needs to really improve its integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem and have an enterprise solution for monitoring, backups, and service mesh.
Read full review
IBM
What impresses me most about IBM Cloud Code Engine is the container workload management capability and the Cloud services and dataflow monitoring functionalities. Data security and network security control via IBM Cloud Code Engine is quite excellent and very responsive data integration functions and the first deployment is not very technical.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Good performance of platform without hiccups
  • Less number of people required to manage cluster
  • Easier to deploy new microservices
Read full review
IBM
  • [One] positive is that we have one tool to learn (and a simple one) for all kinds of deployment. We need less people to maintain the system.
  • We have saved a lot of time on trouble shooting. It's clear how it works. It's "just" kubernetes..
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots

Screenshot of