Amazon ElastiCache

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon ElastiCache
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Amazon ElastiCache offers fully managed Redis and Memcached.N/A
Pricing
Amazon ElastiCache
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon ElastiCache
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon ElastiCache
Considered Both Products
Amazon ElastiCache
Chose Amazon ElastiCache
In order to save some login information, notification alert, and some other critical data, we used DynamoDB instead of ElastiCache due to low cost and data are more persistent as compared with ElastiCache.
Chose Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon Elasticache is better than Amazon Elasticsearch and Amazon SQS as the former is good for dumping a lot of data for searching purposes later on and the latter is good for maintaining a message bus whereas Amazon ElastiCache purely works as a caching data store to provide …
Top Pros
Top Cons
User Ratings
Amazon ElastiCache
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon ElastiCache
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Amazon ElastiCache is a great tool to use when you need to cache data in your application to access it really fast and also want that to be fully managed, cost-efficient, and highly available in the production environment along with monitoring capabilities. It should not be used as a permanent database solution as Redis or Memcached are not alternatives for that. If the load is really less than choosing this might cost you more. Using it when you only want to pay when you run it would be better.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Amazon ElastiCache is fully-managed. Our team is small, and our ability to configure, monitor and patch Redis will never be our competitive advantage.
  • Amazon ElastiCache is fast and scalable. It is easy to scale reads with replicas.
  • Amazon ElastiCache is integrated with CloudWatch. You get metrics out-of-the-box, and it is easy to create alerts for them.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • not to get lost cache data in order to change ElasitCache instance type
  • most of the time cache data are not distributively stored to secondary, mostly goes to primary
  • default TTL should be 30 days or 60 days instead of infinity
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Amazon Elasticache is better than Amazon Elasticsearch and Amazon SQS as the former is good for dumping a lot of data for searching purposes later on and the latter is good for maintaining a message bus whereas Amazon ElastiCache purely works as a caching data store to provide faster data access. AWS DynamoDB is a good alternative if you're looking for a serverless solution as in Amazon ElastiCache, we get to see instances while in AWS DynamoDB, we can simply access the data without the need of bringing up a server.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Basically, zero-maintenance Memcached clusters, meaning the time can be spent elsewhere rather than looking after our own.
Read full review
ScreenShots