Amazon ElastiCache vs. ObjectRocket

Amazon ElastiCache is a great managed Redis or Memcached service. ElastiCache with the Redis engine is great for caching expensive responses or queries. It is great if you need a distributed mutex. It is great as a message broker. If you need Redis but don't have the resources to manage it yourself, consider ElastiCache. It may not be economical for very large scale installations, however.

Incentivized

• Easy to set up and zero maintenance
• Relatively low cost
• Drop-in replacement for Memcached service

Incentivized

• Client could be added on console to access the data stores.
• More integrations with other AWS services.
• Infrastructure uptime can be increase.
• Cost should be reduced.

Incentivized

Amazon Elasticache is better than Amazon Elasticsearch and Amazon SQS as the former is good for dumping a lot of data for searching purposes later on and the latter is good for maintaining a message bus whereas Amazon ElastiCache purely works as a caching data store to provide faster data access. AWS DynamoDB is a good alternative if you're looking for a serverless solution as in Amazon ElastiCache, we get to see instances while in AWS DynamoDB, we can simply access the data without the need of bringing up a server.

Incentivized

• memcached should be improved like Redis
• need serverless with Aurora RDS
• cost should be decreased

Incentivized