Apache Airflow vs. Apache Kafka

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Apache Airflow is an open source tool that can be used to programmatically author, schedule and monitor data pipelines using Python and SQL.N/A
Apache Kafka
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Apache Kafka is an open-source stream processing platform developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala and Java. The Kafka event streaming platform is used by thousands of companies for high-performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission-critical applications.N/A
Pricing
Apache AirflowApache Kafka
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache AirflowApache Kafka
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache AirflowApache Kafka
Considered Both Products
Apache Airflow
Chose Apache Airflow
digdag (https://www.digdag.io/)- Digdag is a very simple build, run, schedule, and monitor complex pipelines of tasks with a simple implementation and no configuration. Easy to write YAMLs

Airflow has a better community and widely adopted. Has a better UI and better documentation
Chose Apache Airflow
Using Jenkins and Kafka, it is not for the same purpose, although it might be similar. I would say AirFlow is really what it says on the can - workflow management. For our organisation, the purpose is clear. So long your aim is to have a rich workflow scheduler and job …
Apache Kafka
Chose Apache Kafka
- The biggest advantage of using Apache Kafka is that it is cloud agnostic - It handles super high volume, is fault tolerance, high performance
Features
Apache AirflowApache Kafka
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
8.7
12 Ratings
5% above category average
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring8.912 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging8.612 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization6.712 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration9.412 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache AirflowApache Kafka
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache AirflowApache Kafka
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(12 ratings)
8.0
(19 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(3 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache AirflowApache Kafka
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Airflow is well-suited for data engineering pipelines, creating scheduled workflows, and working with various data sources. You can implement almost any kind of DAG for any use case using the different operators or enforce your operator using the Python operator with ease. The MLOps feature of Airflow can be enhanced to match MLFlow-like features, making Airflow the go-to solution for all workloads, from data science to data engineering.
Read full review
Apache
Apache Kafka is well-suited for most data-streaming use cases. Amazon Kinesis and Azure EventHubs, unless you have a specific use case where using those cloud PaAS for your data lakes, once set up well, Apache Kafka will take care of everything else in the background. Azure EventHubs, is good for cross-cloud use cases, and Amazon Kinesis - I have no real-world experience. But I believe it is the same.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Apache Airflow is one of the best Orchestration platforms and a go-to scheduler for teams building a data platform or pipelines.
  • Apache Airflow supports multiple operators, such as the Databricks, Spark, and Python operators. All of these provide us with functionality to implement any business logic.
  • Apache Airflow is highly scalable, and we can run a large number of DAGs with ease. It provided HA and replication for workers. Maintaining airflow deployments is very easy, even for smaller teams, and we also get lots of metrics for observability.
Read full review
Apache
  • Really easy to configure. I've used other message brokers such as RabbitMQ and compared to them, Kafka's configurations are very easy to understand and tweak.
  • Very scalable: easily configured to run on multiple nodes allowing for ease of parallelism (assuming your queues/topics don't have to be consumed in the exact same order the messages were delivered)
  • Not exactly a feature, but I trust Kafka will be around for at least another decade because active development has continued to be strong and there's a lot of financial backing from Confluent and LinkedIn, and probably many other companies who are using it (which, anecdotally, is many).
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • UI/Dashboard can be updated to be customisable, and jobs summary in groups of errors/failures/success, instead of each job, so that a summary of errors can be used as a starting point for reviewing them.
  • Navigation - It's a bit dated. Could do with more modern web navigation UX. i.e. sidebars navigation instead of browser back/forward.
  • Again core functional reorg in terms of UX. Navigation can be improved for core functions as well, instead of discovery.
Read full review
Apache
  • Sometimes it becomes difficult to monitor our Kafka deployments. We've been able to overcome it largely using AWS MSK, a managed service for Apache Kafka, but a separate monitoring dashboard would have been great.
  • Simplify the process for local deployment of Kafka and provide a user interface to get visibility into the different topics and the messages being processed.
  • Learning curve around creation of broker and topics could be simplified
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
No answers on this topic
Apache
Kafka is quickly becoming core product of the organization, indeed it is replacing older messaging systems. No better alternatives found yet
Read full review
Usability
Apache
For its capability to connect with multicloud environments. Access Control management is something that we don't get in all the schedulers and orchestrators. But although it provides so many flexibility and options to due to python , some level of knowledge of python is needed to be able to build workflows.
Read full review
Apache
Apache Kafka is highly recommended to develop loosely coupled, real-time processing applications. Also, Apache Kafka provides property based configuration. Producer, Consumer and broker contain their own separate property file
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Apache
Support for Apache Kafka (if willing to pay) is available from Confluent that includes the same time that created Kafka at Linkedin so they know this software in and out. Moreover, Apache Kafka is well known and best practices documents and deployment scenarios are easily available for download. For example, from eBay, Linkedin, Uber, and NYTimes.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Multiple DAGs can be orchestrated simultaneously at varying times, and runs can be reproduced or replicated with relative ease. Overall, utilizing Apache Airflow is easier to use than other solutions now on the market. It is simple to integrate in Apache Airflow, and the workflow can be monitored and scheduling can be done quickly using Apache Airflow. We advocate using this tool for automating the data pipeline or process.
Read full review
Apache
I used other messaging/queue solutions that are a lot more basic than Confluent Kafka, as well as another solution that is no longer in the market called Xively, which was bought and "buried" by Google. In comparison, these solutions offer way fewer functionalities and respond to other needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Impact Depends on number of workflows. If there are lot of workflows then it has a better usecase as the implementation is justified as it needs resources , dedicated VMs, Database that has a cost
  • Donot use it if you have very less usecases
Read full review
Apache
  • Positive: Get a quick and reliable pub/sub model implemented - data across components flows easily.
  • Positive: it's scalable so we can develop small and scale for real-world scenarios
  • Negative: it's easy to get into a confusing situation if you are not experienced yet or something strange has happened (rare, but it does). Troubleshooting such situations can take time and effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots