TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Geode

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AApache Geode is a distributed in-memory database designed to support low latency, high concurrency solutions, available free and open source since 2002. With it, users can build high-speed, data-intensive applications that elastically meet performance requirements. Apache Geode blends techniques for data replication, partitioning and distributed processing.N/A

    IBM Cloud Databases

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud Databases are open source data stores for enterprise application development. Built on a Kubernetes foundation, they offer a database platform for serverless applications. They are designed to scale storage and compute resources seamlessly without being constrained by the limits of a single server. Natively integrated and available in the IBM Cloud console, these databases are now available through a consistent consumption, pricing, and interaction model. They aim to provide a cohesive…N/A
    Pricing
    Apache GeodeIBM Cloud Databases
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache GeodeIBM Cloud Databases
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache GeodeIBM Cloud Databases
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    80%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    14 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    Features
    Apache GeodeIBM Cloud Databases
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Apache Geode and IBM Cloud Databases
    Feature
    Apache Geode
    8.7
    1 Ratings
    2% above category average
    IBM Cloud Databases
    -
    Ratings
    Performance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Apache Geode and IBM Cloud Databases
    Feature
    Apache Geode
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cloud Databases
    7.3
    94 Ratings
    14% below category average
    Automatic software patching00 Ratings8.577 Ratings
    Database scalability00 Ratings10.088 Ratings
    Automated backups00 Ratings7.091 Ratings
    Database security provisions00 Ratings9.084 Ratings
    Monitoring and metrics00 Ratings4.088 Ratings
    Automatic host deployment00 Ratings5.269 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache GeodeIBM Cloud Databases
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    MongoDB Atlas
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Azure Database
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Google Cloud SQL
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache GeodeIBM Cloud Databases
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (96 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    1.0
    (10 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache GeodeIBM Cloud Databases
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    The biggest advantage of using Apache Geode is DB like consistency. So for applications whose data needs to be in-memory, accessible at low latencies and most importantly writes have to be consistent, should use Apache Geode. For our application quite some amount of data is static which we store in MySQL as it can be easily manipulated. But since this data is large R/w from DB becomes expensive. So we started using Redis. Redis does a brilliant job, but with complex data structures and no query like capability, we have to manage it via code. We are experimenting with Apache Geode and it looks promising as now we can query on complex data-structures and get the required data quickly and also updates consistent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Less Appropriate Scenario: 1) Small Scale or Low Budget Projects 2) Organizations with limited expertise in cloud technologies may find the learning curve steep, especially if they are not familiar with the IBM Cloud platform 3) If database requirements are highly dynamic and change frequently, the comprehensive features and management provided by IBM Cloud Databases might be overkill. A more flexible, self-managed solution could be preferable for adapting to rapid changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Super Fast data pull/push
    • Provided ACID transactions, so it works like a SQL Database
    • Provides replication & partitioning, so our data is never lost and extraction is super fast. NoSql like properties
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The ease of setup was effortless. For anyone with development experience, a few simple questions such as name and login data will get you set up.
    • The web application to manage cluster settings, billing settings and even introspect the data was simple and most importantly worked all the time. This can not always be said for web interfaces of other products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Needs more supporting languages. Out of box Python, Nodejs adapters would be wonderful
    • Currently it supports just KV Store. But if we could cache documents or timeseries data would be great
    • Needs more community support, documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Better cost reports, before just increasing to another tier, thus increasing the price. This is critical for early stage startups, where budget is tight.
    • Add more data center options. As a comparison, a similar service, Aiven.io has dozen more options than Compose (basically all big cloud providers). We moved from AWS to Digital Ocean, which made us stop using Compose, since Compose forces us to be either on IBM or AWS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM is our trusted partner which never failed to meet our expectations. Stability, efficiency, usability and security is a must have for our business which is fully provided by IBM Cloud Databases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    Still Experimenting. Initial results are good. we need to figure out if we can completely replace Redis. Cost wise if it makes sense to keep both or replacement is feasible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Cloud Databases' pricing structure is easy to understand, and if you choose the right product, you can operate your system at minimal cost. Although there is ample documentation available, there doesn't seem to be a user community running on it, so specific usage know-how and troubleshooting can sometimes take longer than expected.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    Never contacted support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Support is helpful enough, but we haven't always had questions answered in a satisfactory manner. At one time we realized that Compose had stopped taking database snapshots on its two-per-day schedule, and had in fact not taken one for many days. Support recognized the problem and it was fixed, but the lack of proactive checks and the inability to share exactly what happened has caused us to look elsewhere for production work loads
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Still Experimenting. But looks promising as it has query capabilities over complex data structures
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The reason why I choose IBM Cloud Databases is that the IBM cloud toolset is already being used in other functions of the company and by using IBM Cloud Databases, the other cloud tools are better embedded and integrated. If the company is set to use amazon tools, I would go for rds.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Still experimenting so difficult to quote
    • For a small size project/teams might be an overkill as it still has certain learning curve
    • For Medium to large projects with complex Data Structures that need to be queried with a fast o/p it definitely works
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Prove use cases prior to administering entire platform, obtain ROI faster
    • Able to achieve the technological components of our advanced analytics team without full scale purchase of AI platform
    • Developed several studies to prove out cloud Db value, speed to deploy
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots