Apache Geode vs. MariaDB Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Geode
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Geode is a distributed in-memory database designed to support low latency, high concurrency solutions, available free and open source since 2002. With it, users can build high-speed, data-intensive applications that elastically meet performance requirements. Apache Geode blends techniques for data replication, partitioning and distributed processing.N/A
MariaDB Platform
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
MariaDB is an open-source relational database made by the original developers of MySQL, supported by the MariaDB Foundation and a community of developers. The community states recent additional capabilities as including clustering with Galera Cluster 4, compatibility with Oracle Database, and Temporal Data Tables, allowing one to query the data as it stood at any point in the past.N/A
Pricing
Apache GeodeMariaDB Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache GeodeMariaDB Platform
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache GeodeMariaDB Platform
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Apache GeodeMariaDB Platform
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Apache Geode
8.7
1 Ratings
1% below category average
MariaDB Platform
-
Ratings
Performance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache GeodeMariaDB Platform
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache GeodeMariaDB Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(29 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.4
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(16 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache GeodeMariaDB Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
The biggest advantage of using Apache Geode is DB like consistency. So for applications whose data needs to be in-memory, accessible at low latencies and most importantly writes have to be consistent, should use Apache Geode. For our application quite some amount of data is static which we store in MySQL as it can be easily manipulated. But since this data is large R/w from DB becomes expensive. So we started using Redis. Redis does a brilliant job, but with complex data structures and no query like capability, we have to manage it via code. We are experimenting with Apache Geode and it looks promising as now we can query on complex data-structures and get the required data quickly and also updates consistent.
Read full review
MariaDB
  • Applications where the users need [to] execute many short queries.
  • With new storage engines such as Aria, which allows to replace MyISAM with some improvements, and XtraDB, which evolves InnoDB.
  • To fuse the legacy features with the features available in NoSQL databases.
  • Connection management, which allows multiplying the number of concurrent accesses.
  • New clustering engines, such as Galera, which allow interesting possibilities for Cloud adoption.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Super Fast data pull/push
  • Provided ACID transactions, so it works like a SQL Database
  • Provides replication & partitioning, so our data is never lost and extraction is super fast. NoSql like properties
Read full review
MariaDB
  • Simpler learning curve. MariaDB is a cleaner, simpler system that is (IMO) easier to learn and easier to manage effectively than many other database systems.
  • Lower hardware requirements. After migrating to MariaDB from another database software system, we find that our hardware needs have substantially decreased.
  • MariaDB support is very responsive. It's like they actually care. On the few occasions we've run into technical issues, support has always come through with what we needed. Once it was showing me a relatively new feature the server supported that I wasn't aware of, that, once I was able to properly make use of it helped me resolve a serious production performance issue.
  • Architectural flexibility. As an example, the ready availability of synchronous (Galera) versus asynchronous replication schemes without being locked into one of the other by enormous technical complexity or punitive licensing, allows the customer to find what really works best for their needs.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Needs more supporting languages. Out of box Python, Nodejs adapters would be wonderful
  • Currently it supports just KV Store. But if we could cache documents or timeseries data would be great
  • Needs more community support, documentation.
Read full review
MariaDB
  • Driver Support - Some third party applications use database drivers that cause unexplained slowness with MariaDB. This can be worked around by using the MySQL drivers, but it's not clear what causes the problem in the first place.
  • Support - While online communities are helpful in diagnosing problems, there isn't as much professional documentation/support available for MariaDB as some of the other major database options.
  • Data Visualization - It would be helpful if there were more built in options for analyzing statistics and generating reports.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
Still Experimenting. Initial results are good. we need to figure out if we can completely replace Redis. Cost wise if it makes sense to keep both or replacement is feasible.
Read full review
MariaDB
MariaDB is very usable and stable to be used in production settings as an alternative to MySQL. The shortcomings of SQL are present but well understood in the community, and if the decision were to be made again, I would choose MariaDB over MySQL on future projects.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
Never contacted support
Read full review
MariaDB
We have launched several inquiries to MariaDB support and they have always responded very quickly and have not been tutoring for the duration of the incident/problem.
Likewise, they want to hold constant meetings with the client to get their opinion as well as how they can help.
I see a very human support and concerned about the customer.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Still Experimenting. But looks promising as it has query capabilities over complex data structures
Read full review
MariaDB
MariaDB stacks up the the competition just fine. Due to is ture open source nature we do not have to worry about licencing and spending money on nothing. Moreover, MariaDB does everything that we need to get done. We can run data that is a million rows or many smaller projects on the same environment with little overhead. One of the best features that MariaDB has is the ability of backup or dump data to standard text sql statements. That was one of the reasons why we choose MariaDb because it makes backups or transferring data a snap
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Still experimenting so difficult to quote
  • For a small size project/teams might be an overkill as it still has certain learning curve
  • For Medium to large projects with complex Data Structures that need to be queried with a fast o/p it definitely works
Read full review
MariaDB
  • Low CAPEX if you have a team that use open source software day by day
  • Medium OPEX if you have a team that use open source software day by day
  • Perfect to use in academic ambient to support researchers and students
Read full review
ScreenShots