What users are saying about

HBase vs Percona Server for MongoDB

HBase
32 Ratings
Percona Server for MongoDB
5 Ratings

HBase

32 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.5 out of 100

Based on 32 reviews and ratings

Percona Server for MongoDB

5 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.5 out of 100

Based on 5 reviews and ratings

Feature Set Ratings

    NoSQL Databases

    7.7

    HBase

    77%

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Apache HBase ranks higher in 7/7 features
    Apache HBase ranks higher in 7/7 features

    Performance

    7.1
    71%
    5 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Availability

    7.8
    78%
    5 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Concurrency

    7.0
    70%
    5 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Security

    7.8
    78%
    5 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Scalability

    8.6
    86%
    5 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Data model flexibility

    7.1
    71%
    5 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Deployment model flexibility

    8.2
    82%
    5 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Percona Server for MongoDB is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    7.7

    HBase

    77%
    10 Ratings
    8.0

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    80%
    1 Rating

    Likelihood to Renew

    7.9

    HBase

    79%
    10 Ratings

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Usability

    HBase

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.0

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    70%
    1 Rating

    Support Rating

    HBase

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    80%
    1 Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    HBase

    Hbase is well suited for large organizations with millions of operations performing on tables, real-time lookup of records in a table, range queries, random reads and writes and online analytics operations.Hbase cannot be replaced for traditional databases as it cannot support all the features, CPU and memory intensive. Observed increased latency when using with MapReduce job joins.

    Read full review

    Vinaybabu Raghunandha Naidu | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Vinaybabu Raghunandha Naidu
    View all 10 answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    It offers good support for the implementation of solutions in the public and on-premises cloud and integration with other services such as Hashicorp Vault for data encryption. One of the main advantages is the ease of configuration, in addition to offering transaction support for the different operations and scalability of the servers.

    Read full review

    Jose Manuel Ortega | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Jose Manuel Ortega
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    Pros

    HBase

    • Scalability. HBase can scale to trillions of records.
    • Fast. HBase is extremely fast to scan values or retrieve individual records by key.
    • HBase can be accessed by standard SQL via Apache Phoenix.
    • Integrated. I can easily store and retrieve data from HBase using Apache Spark.
    • It is easy to set up DR and backups.
    • Ingest. It is easy to ingest data into HBase via shell, Java, Apache NiFi, Storm, Spark, Flink, Python and other means.

    Read full review

    Timothy Spann | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Timothy Spann
    View all 10 answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    • High performance
    • Integration with other tools and services
    • Big data projects oriented
    • High availability and scalability

    Read full review

    Jose Manuel Ortega | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Jose Manuel Ortega
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    Cons

    HBase

    • There are very few commands in HBase.
    • Stored procedures functionality is not available so it should be implemented.
    • HBase is CPU and Memory intensive with large sequential input or output access while as Map Reduce jobs are primarily input or output bound with fixed memory. HBase integrated with Map-reduce jobs will result in random latencies.

    Read full review

    RAVI MISHRA | TrustRadius Reviewer
    RAVI MISHRA
    View all 10 answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    • The learning curve makes it a bit tricky to use at first.
    • Documentation is an aspect to improve, especially for people who are just starting out.
    • At the interface level, the user experience could be improved.

    Read full review

    Jose Manuel Ortega | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Jose Manuel Ortega
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    Pricing Details

    HBase

    General

    Free Trial
    —
    Free/Freemium Version
    —
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    —
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    —

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    General

    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level set up fee?
    Optional

    Starting Price

    —

    Likelihood to Renew

    HBase

    HBase 7.9
    Based on 10 answers
    There's really not anything else out there that I've seen comparable for my use cases. HBase has never proven me wrong. Some companies align their whole business on HBase and are moving all of their infrastructure from other database engines to HBase. It's also open source and has a very collaborative community.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 10 answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Usability

    HBase

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    Percona Server for MongoDB 7.0
    Based on 1 answer
    One aspect to improve is the user experience since sometimes the steps to take are not clear and the user may need to review some of the actions before continuing with the next ones. Another aspect to improve is the documentation and support for developers who want to know the tool.

    Read full review

    Jose Manuel Ortega | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Jose Manuel Ortega
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    Support Rating

    HBase

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    Percona Server for MongoDB 8.0
    Based on 1 answer
    It offers good support for the implementation of solutions in the public and on-premises cloud and integration with other services such as Hashicorp Vault for data encryption. Also, it offers support for different compatible programming languages such as C, C ++, Java, as well as offering good support for the persistence of schema-free data and the possibility of saving data in memory.

    Read full review

    Jose Manuel Ortega | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Jose Manuel Ortega
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    Alternatives Considered

    HBase

    Cassandra os great for writes. But with large datasets, depending, not as great as HBASE. Cassandra does support parquet now. HBase still performance issues. Cassandra has use cases of being used as time series. HBase, it fails miserably. GeoSpatial data, Hbase does work to an extent. HA between the two are almost the same.

    Read full review

    Anson Abraham | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Anson Abraham
    View all 10 answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    At the performance level, it is similar to other solutions such as MongoDB and Percona Server for MySQL. and at the customization level, it offers better support for the development of specific solutions that seek good performance in transactions.

    Read full review

    Jose Manuel Ortega | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Jose Manuel Ortega
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    Return on Investment

    HBase

    • As Hbase is a noSql database, here we don't have transaction support and we cannot do many operations on the data.
    • Not having the feature of primary or a composite primary key is an issue as the architecture to be defined cannot be the same legacy type. Also the transaction concept is not applicable here.
    • The way data is printed on console is not so user-friendly. So we had to use some abstraction over HBase (eg apache phoenix) which means there is one new component to handle.

    Read full review

    Bharadwaj (Brad) Chivukula | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Bharadwaj (Brad) Chivukula
    View all 10 answers on this topic

    Percona Server for MongoDB

    • It offers a good alternative solution compared with other open source databases.
    • We have many resources at the documentation level and other tools that help the integration with different programming languages.

    Read full review

    Jose Manuel Ortega | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Jose Manuel Ortega
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    Screenshots

    HBase

    —

    Add comparison