TrustRadius

Apache Iceberg vs. DBeaver

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Iceberg
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Iceberg is an open table format for huge analytic datasets. Iceberg adds tables to compute engines including Spark, Trino, PrestoDB, Flink, Hive and Impala using a high-performance table format that works just like a SQL table. Iceberg is used in production where a single table can contain tens of petabytes of data and even these huge tables can be read without a distributed SQL engine. It was designed to solve correctness problems in eventually-consistent cloud object stores.
$0
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
DBeaver offers comprehensive data management tools designed to help teams explore, process, and administrate SQL, NoSQL, and cloud data sources. DBeaver is available commercially as DBeaver PRO and for free as DBeaver Community.
$11
per month per user
Pricing
Apache IcebergDBeaver
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Lite Edition Subscription
$11
per month per user
Enterprise Edition Subscription
$25
per month per user
Lite Edition License
$110
per year per user
Enterprise Edition License
$250
per year per user
Ultimate Edition License
$500
per year per user
CloudBeaver Enterprise
$1,000
per year per 5 users
DBeaver Team Edition
$1,280
per year per 1 administrator and 2 developers
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache IcebergDBeaver
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Discounts are available for multi-user licenses.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache IcebergDBeaver
Features
Apache IcebergDBeaver
Database Development
Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
Apache Iceberg
-
Ratings
DBeaver
7.3
11 Ratings
15% below category average
Version control tools00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Test data generation00 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Performance optimization tools00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Schema maintenance00 Ratings8.49 Ratings
Database change management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Database Administration
Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Iceberg
-
Ratings
DBeaver
5.5
9 Ratings
38% below category average
User management00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Database security00 Ratings5.06 Ratings
Database status reporting00 Ratings4.07 Ratings
Change management00 Ratings5.06 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache IcebergDBeaver
Small Businesses
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
Sequel Pro
Sequel Pro
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache IcebergDBeaver
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache IcebergDBeaver
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
No answers on this topic
DBeaver
If you are connecting to Snowflake and want to query from your laptop, I find that this is much easier to use than Snowflake's IDE. It allows us as a business intelligence team to more easily connect to our servers, and code with much less hassle. It would be less appropriate if you are only on an on-premises SQL server, in that case, I would just use SSMS.
Jeremy Pierce, MBA | TrustRadius Reviewer
Jeremy Pierce, MBA
Data Warehouse Engineer
Read full review
Pros
Apache
No answers on this topic
DBeaver
  • Identify types of DB connections by color code: development, testing and production.
  • Predictive typing, it is incredibly accurate and saves me a lot of time.
  • Jump between different simultaneous DB connections.
  • Navigate through the schema object tree.
  • Provide all the tools I need in one window.
Gustavo Du Mortier | TrustRadius Reviewer
Gustavo Du Mortier
Database Designer
Read full review
Cons
Apache
No answers on this topic
DBeaver
  • Schema editing is not very intuitive. Editing a single column forces you into multiple tab windows when trying to change something simple like a column name.
  • Sorting and filtering in data is nice, but buried in long right-click menus.
  • Some things are definitely non-standard UI for a Windows application, so it might be hard for die-hard Windows fans to get used to.
Aaron Smith | TrustRadius Reviewer
Aaron Smith
Senior Software Developer
Read full review
Usability
Apache
No answers on this topic
DBeaver
It's perfectly easy to use. Not super new and shiny with lots of accessibility tailored tools, but does the job
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
DBeaver
Not a lot of users have DBeaver so fewer resources are available online to help you if you have any issues. When I was trying to figure out how to create my own ER diagrams, it was a little tough to find resources
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
No answers on this topic
DBeaver
MySQL workbench from MySQL only supports MySQL databases and it only provides basic functionality. On top of that, the user experience could be quite confusing for first-time users. SSMS from SQL server doesn't support inline editing nicely. The view for inline editing and view data is different, making it uncomfortable to use. All in all, DBeaver is the best tool when you manage a lot of databases with different types.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
No answers on this topic
DBeaver
  • Positive Ability to manage DBeaver and query ad-hoc quickly
  • By having the queries saved it has saved developer time and thereby increased the ROI on the investment on the tool
  • This has made firefighting quicker and freed up resources for more development work.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots