AppFog (discontinued) vs. CA Workload Automation vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AppFog (discontinued)
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
AppFog was a cloud-agnostic application and infrastructure management platform used to manage workloads across on-premises and third-party cloud environments. It has been discontinued.N/A
CA Workload Automation
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
As the name may suggest, CA Workload Automation is CA Technologies workload automation offering.N/A
OpenText Operations Orchestration
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText™ Operations Orchestration automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automations use low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrations are done with an API-rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrates workflows.N/A
Pricing
AppFog (discontinued)CA Workload AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppFog (discontinued)CA Workload AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppFog (discontinued)CA Workload AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Considered Multiple Products
AppFog (discontinued)
Chose AppFog (discontinued)
Appfog was one of the requirements of our project since it was the fastest growing PAAS provider. Also it was easy to deploy an application with multiple options to choose for the development environment for our application. It was "ALL in ONE."
Chose AppFog (discontinued)
Primarily because it used to have a good free tier earlier, which it does not anymore. It's simple, and things are available to use. Compared to it's competitors, it does has less features, but that kind of acts in its favor. That adds to the simplicity, and ease of use for a …
CA Workload Automation
Chose CA Workload Automation
Delivered PeopleSoft Process scheduler doesn't provide one stop to review all batch jobs and dependencies. Also, it doesn't provide graphical representation of all jobs. In contrast, Autosys provides nice graphical interface of all jobs and it's status. Autosys allows to review …
Chose CA Workload Automation
We use these products as well, but currently the usage depends on the department.
Chose CA Workload Automation
We selected CA Workload Automation for the ease of integration and less time to setup. It has less overhead to manage the application and is a very robust application.
Chose CA Workload Automation
CA Workload Automation stacks up very well compared to Cisco/Tidal, BMC and is far superior to crontab. CA Workload Automation has easy initial setup, efficient job management and scheduling, supports multiple applications and environments and improves business critical needs …
OpenText Operations Orchestration
Chose OpenText Operations Orchestration
Most product works well enough, but none of them combine the non-agent/client approach to automation with an easy to develop mechanism (the drag&drop development approach) This alone put this solution on top of our preferred implantation product list
Features
AppFog (discontinued)CA Workload AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
AppFog (discontinued)
6.5
Ratings
18% below category average
CA Workload Automation
-
Ratings
OpenText Operations Orchestration
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability5.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration6.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation7.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication8.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery6.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
AppFog (discontinued)
-
Ratings
CA Workload Automation
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
OpenText Operations Orchestration
9.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Multi-platform scheduling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Central monitoring00 Ratings10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Logging00 Ratings10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications00 Ratings9.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization00 Ratings8.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Application integration00 Ratings8.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AppFog (discontinued)CA Workload AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppFog (discontinued)CA Workload AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Likelihood to Recommend
6.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppFog (discontinued)CA Workload AutomationOpenText Operations Orchestration
Likelihood to Recommend
AppFog is good for academic purposes. It comes in very handy for cloud deployments.
Read full review
If batch jobs are heavily used then this product is highly recommended since it maintains dependencies between jobs, notifies if there are any failures, and puts the next batches on hold if previous dependent jobs fails.
Read full review
For our business, this system is really THE system. We use it for the management of almost all aspects of a member's account. I honestly cannot think of something that it cannot do.
Read full review
Pros
  • Quick deployment of pre-built virtual machines
  • Some of the virtual machines also are readily available with a pack of softwares
  • Good Stability. Using it as a student, I have never experienced any downtime issues with the projects deployed on AppFog.
Read full review
  • cross platform scheduling
  • job schedule controlling based on return codes
  • data set triggering based on incoming files thru an ftp server
  • Job condition code processing/triggering
  • agent monitoring on multiple platforms.
Read full review
  • Allows for the quick disconnection of accounts that break our terms of service
  • Seamless integration with our billing system
  • Has the ability to house all member/client account information in one single location
Read full review
Cons
  • Though it is good and easy for developers, it lacks operational activities and monitoring tools.
  • It is easy to deploy WAR on AppFog with its console but sometimes it can lack on the performance and feasibility.
Read full review
  • Better Reporting and Troubleshooting of why some jobs are failing.
Read full review
  • The product build in portal need to be more flexible
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Very happy!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
It would be great if customer chat experience is also readily available.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Appfog was one of the requirements of our project since it was the fastest growing PAAS provider. Also it was easy to deploy an application with multiple options to choose for the development environment for our application. It was "ALL in ONE."
Read full review
CA Workload Automation stacks up very well compared to Cisco/Tidal, BMC and is far superior to crontab. CA Workload Automation has easy initial setup, efficient job management and scheduling, supports multiple applications and environments and improves business critical needs including SLA, increasing productivity while decreasing processing workload times and failures. CA Workload Automation also integrates well with Automation Change Control Expert or ACCE which is a nice migration tool to have if you're managing jobs in the thousands.
Read full review
Most product works well enough, but none of them combine the non-agent/client approach to automation with an easy to develop mechanism (the drag&drop development approach) This alone put this solution on top of our preferred implantation product list
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our project was deployed with good efficiency and easily accessible.
  • The platform was much recommeded across the groups and peers.
Read full review
  • Positively affected in resolving issues through alerts during peak traffic.
  • Monitoring directly help during Thanksgiving and Black Friday traffic.
  • Reporting helped in explanation of issues to higher management.
Read full review
  • Product enabled reduce manpower and overall costs for most services implement.
  • The ROI is constantly being measured and evaluated by the product portal as time&money measurements
Read full review
ScreenShots