AppFog (discontinued) vs. Devart ODBC Driver vs. Oracle Application Container Cloud (discontinued)

It was very good to use in small scale projects. Considering the high end projects with many instances and multi-platform architectures, it is better to test before the application is deployed. I think few of the questions can be general - who are the system users and what size is the application focussing on? How much resources are required? Will the application require any additional services?

Incentivized

It is appropriate in all scenarios. It is perfect to connect with the database. Actually, nothing to dislike in functionality and performance. It is stand-alone and doesn't need any additional application to be installed.

Incentivized

For how it is used within the organization it is perfectly fine. We use it for benefits, salary, and vacation tracking. It does make it easy to find your information within the system and make changes.

Incentivized

• Quick deployment of pre-built virtual machines
• Some of the virtual machines also are readily available with a pack of softwares
• Good Stability. Using it as a student, I have never experienced any downtime issues with the projects deployed on AppFog.

Incentivized

• Far less connection failures. We had a lot of failures with the tool that we were using before.
• High performance and new features are really useful. Direct mode connectivity seems to make the difference that was very much needed.
• Works very well with Oracle Database 10g.

Incentivized

• Ease of use.
• User-friendly.
• Sleek layout.

Incentivized

• Though it is good and easy for developers, it lacks operational activities and monitoring tools.
• It is easy to deploy WAR on AppFog with its console but sometimes it can lack on the performance and feasibility.

Incentivized

• User Interface could be better.
• Error Messages and error handling could be improved to be more relevant and specific.
• Availability.

Incentivized

• Fewer tabs.
• More direct access to information.
• More insight into where approvals are within the system.

Incentivized

I am not a part of the team that would make this decision but as far as I know they are happy with the platform and how it performs.

Incentivized

Incredibly easy to use and learn how to use. The interface is extremely easy to use.

Incentivized

Support has been great so far but still, it could be better.

Incentivized

The team who helps with the issue is very helpful when resolving the issue and usually can handle it in a very timely manner.

Incentivized

The system is very easy to use.

Incentivized

Primarily because it used to have a good free tier earlier, which it does not anymore. It's simple, and things are available to use. Compared to it's competitors, it does has less features, but that kind of acts in its favor. That adds to the simplicity, and ease of use for a new user.

Incentivized

Devart Driver ODBC for MySQL is best with no known issues. It is stand-alone. It supports SSH/SSL communication. supports HTTP / HTTPS tunneling. It is available for a variety of operating systems like Windows, Mac, and Linux. It is available for 32-bit and 64-bit environments. It supports all renowned programming languages. it supports multiple languages. It allows various data types.

Incentivized

• Our project was deployed with good efficiency and easily accessible.
• The platform was much recommeded across the groups and peers.

Incentivized

• Our organization has been largely moving into agile development life cycle and continuous integration is a key towards agile success. Automation is the first step towards continuous integration. We are really happy using Devart as a part of our automation engineering. It definitely contributes towards overall success.
• We are trying to extend the usage. The development team has also shown interest towards the usage.
• This is a cost effective tool. It is worth the price.

Incentivized

• Employee Empowerment
• Reduced lagtime
• Connects correct people to correct situations

Incentivized