TrustRadius

Appgate SDP vs. Ericom Security by Cradlepoint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appgate SDP
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
AppGate SDP (software-defined perimeter) from Cyxtera Technologies headquartered in Addison is a zero trust network security product.N/A
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Ericom Security and Cradlepoint, part of Ericsson, are expanding the scope and impact of zero trust security services to protect organizations from advanced threats. Ericom’s flagship Security Service Edge (SSE) cloud platform leverages remote browser isolation, application isolation, microsegmentation, and virtualization technologies.N/A
Pricing
Appgate SDPEricom Security by Cradlepoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Appgate SDPEricom Security by Cradlepoint
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Appgate SDPEricom Security by Cradlepoint
Considered Both Products
Appgate SDP
JS
James Sharp
Senior Voice Engineer
Chose Appgate SDP
The existing system was Fortigate. The management of the system was a hassle. Because IT personnel had to manually create VPN accounts, user passwords were known to who created them and the end user did not have a way to change them. This created a security issue in the …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Appgate SDP
AppGate SDP was selected before I arrived at the project; I do not have details of the product selection process firsthand.
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Appgate SDPEricom Security by Cradlepoint
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Appgate SDPEricom Security by Cradlepoint
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Appgate SDPEricom Security by Cradlepoint
Likelihood to Recommend
I would recommend AppGate SDP to anyone that has fairly clear cut use cases for systems with user access with less than 5K resources per user. We found it works well in those cases and fully as advertised. The application can easily hide applications and resources from unauthorized access and is a reliable tool in your ZeroTrust arsenal.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Software-Defined perimeter
  • Hide resources to non-authorized/authenticated users.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Live logging in the client. Currently you have to "download" the logs into a zip file and then open that zipfile to look at the logs. There's no logfile to tail or watch.
  • Load balancing between controllers could be better. Currently relies on round robin DNS and sometimes a browser will pick a different IP than previous and you'll get a big "LOST CONNECTION TO CONTROLLER" message.
JS
James Sharp
Senior Voice Engineer
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The company has been supportive overall of our needs and desired features. I have not personally called the support services, but I've heard no direct complaints either.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The existing system was FortiGate. The management of the system was a hassle. Because IT personnel had to manually create VPN accounts, user passwords were known to who created them and the end user did not have a way to change them. This created a security issue in the event an IT engineer left the company.
JS
James Sharp
Senior Voice Engineer
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It freed up IT personnel time. No longer did they have to manually create the account on the VPN endpoint and manually install the client or create VPN profiles on the employees computer.
JS
James Sharp
Senior Voice Engineer
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots