Appium vs. WebToNative

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appium
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
WebToNative
Score 0.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
WebToNative is a no-code platform that allows anyone to convert their website into a functional mobile app for Android and iOS without any technical skills. The service is designed for businesses, entrepreneurs, and creators who want to expand their digital presence and reach mobile users without the cost and complexity of traditional app development. With features like push notifications, AdMob integration, custom branding, and fast publishing to app stores, WebToNative is presented as a…
$49
one-time fee per app
Pricing
AppiumWebToNative
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppiumWebToNative
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppiumWebToNative
User Ratings
AppiumWebToNative
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppiumWebToNative
Likelihood to Recommend
JS Foundation
1. It's open source which supports range of languages, operating systems and languages. Well suited for Android and IOS mobile automation. Supports all kinds of apps, which makes it flexible and robust mobile testing tool 2. It is less appropriate where we need intercept network call to verify the API calls. Extensive coding experience is required to work Appium
Read full review
Orufy
No answers on this topic
Pros
JS Foundation
  • It uses WebDriver API so it makes it easy to use for former web test automation engineers.
  • It can be managed via the command line via an extensive set of parameters.
  • It handles implicit waits at the server side that is especially valuable in distributed infrastructure.
Read full review
Orufy
No answers on this topic
Cons
JS Foundation
  • Element browser sometimes is unreliable and has sporadic fails.
  • Appium running is a bit slow, compared to tests written with Appium and with Espresso or XCTest.
Read full review
Orufy
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
JS Foundation
I am rating 10/10 because Appium can use with multiple programming languages with multiple Test engines. Also, it works for both Android and iOS.
Read full review
Orufy
No answers on this topic
Usability
JS Foundation
I would like to give 9/10 rating to Appium because of it can easily integrate with popular frameworks and CI/CD tools, as well as it is reliable, flexible and easy to use. The setup can bit complex in initial step, but once on configured it's very easy to use and enables stable and scalable mobile automation for real and cloud devices.
Read full review
Orufy
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
JS Foundation
If you're an Apple developer, you use Xcode. It's practically a forced necessity. For system testing though, it doesn't have to be. You can have your development team focus on unit and integration tests in their platform and another team automate acceptance tests with a language they are more familiar with.
Read full review
Orufy
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
JS Foundation
  • Appium is open source, so it's free. That's budget friendly right there.
  • The ability to write mobile automation tests has saved considerable time for our manual test team, but that is true with most automation tests.
  • We use Sauce Labs with our other automation, but Appium works great with Sauce Labs, as well, if I needed to run on emulators and simulators.
Read full review
Orufy
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

WebToNative Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of