Arcano vs. Progress ShareFile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arcano
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Arcano is used to send and receive files from and to clients securely and end-to-end-encrypted. With Arcano, lawyers and other professional secret carriers can share large files with their clients and co-lawyers.
$6
per month
Progress ShareFile
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011, and is now offered by Progress Software.
$17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Pricing
ArcanoProgress ShareFile
Editions & Modules
Basic
$6
per month
Advanced
$17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Premium
$27.50
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Industry Advantage
$45.83
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Virtual Data Room
$75.00
per month per user (minimum 5 users)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArcanoProgress ShareFile
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ArcanoProgress ShareFile
Considered Both Products
Arcano

No answer on this topic

Progress ShareFile
Chose Progress ShareFile
We are in the early stages of evaluating Podio. It is supremely flexible for advanced workflow management and is currently the leading contender for when we move forward.
Chose Progress ShareFile
Progress ShareFile is the option which my employer selected which I have free access to. The other platforms that I have utilized are in connection with an M&A transaction that a client or advisor has engaged for the transaction. ShareFile is simple to use for its options but …
Chose Progress ShareFile
better and easier usability, better security
Chose Progress ShareFile
The other software is for document management and signing. We prefer Progress ShareFile for its original file transfer and sharing functions.
Chose Progress ShareFile
creating those anonymous download-links is the main factor I use Progress ShareFile, besides ofcourse the sharing of "big" files with easy access to other end-users
Chose Progress ShareFile
ShareFile offers more professional level services, and doesn't constantly "run out" of space, forcing you to upgrade to continue. When doing a cost comparison, the competitors may seem cheaper at first, but by the time you add on the features to make it comparable, the pricing …
Chose Progress ShareFile
The ability to learn how to access, store, share, and retrieve documents is simpler than in other applications, and that is what keeps me in the application. Even though my Microsoft 365 professional and Adobe Acrobat Pro applications, which I currently subscribe to, include …
Chose Progress ShareFile
Dropbox and others like Mega is are open to anyone and when they leave your company they take those documents with them. ShareFile give secure sharing but you keep control of your documents. ShareFile also offers other tools like Outlook plug-ins and windows mapping tools.
Chose Progress ShareFile
ShareFile is cheaper, but I think Box had more user friendly features
Chose Progress ShareFile
DocuSign did not allow me to save directly to a client folder. ShareFile will allow this, and it cut out having to move or download the file then store it in a client folder. We used that along with Dropbox. Dropbox did not allow us to seamlessly see who had access to what …
Chose Progress ShareFile
I use ShareFile because it is simple and offers easy use of esignatures - and unlimited. Docusign is getting expensive and charges often on a per "envelope" basis which doesn't work for me.
Chose Progress ShareFile
It has been years since I compared ShareFile with other secure data storage offerings. I chose ShareFile because of its affordability and need to have scalability.
Dropbox, while it gives 2GB of free storage, seems to charge more for the same service I get with ShareFile. I …
Chose Progress ShareFile
Ease of use, cost and proficiency is above and beyond what other products offer. Customer service is down to earth, and you feel like your concerns are addressed appropriately.
Chose Progress ShareFile
I chose to stick with ShareFile because of the signature certificate feature that is included with the software. The two programs are both relativley easy for me to use, but Adobe Acrobat does not have this feature included. Additionally, ShareFile can be opened in Browser and …
Chose Progress ShareFile
The ShareFile website never broke, so we switched the signature service to this platform too. Because in PandaDoc sometimes it was hard to find some signed documents from years ago, also we couldn't find an efficient way to order the signature documents for each client, but …
Chose Progress ShareFile
A lot more user friendly and less phone calls for assistance which make the purpose of smooth electronic communication a great thing. I like that it doesn't require 1 person to sign before the other person can and that we are notified separately once each person signs required …
Chose Progress ShareFile
The large file size for uploading and downloading documents was the one thing that the others just couldn't compare to.
Chose Progress ShareFile
Other platforms allow you to share information but without the security and confirmation guarantees that ShareFile offers. Although they provide fewer features, they are often less intuitive and less easy to work with. To date we do not consider trying other options, as we do …
Chose Progress ShareFile
We have one consulting engineer that uses MS Sharepoint. We find it comparable to ShareFile, but see no particular advantage to it over ShareFile. We don't really know a lot about it, or what it costs to use.
Chose Progress ShareFile
I think Dropbox is a plague to the world of cloud storage. It sucks. ShareFile doesn't suck.
Chose Progress ShareFile
For an organization that requires reliable security when sending sensitive data, ShareFile is the application to use. ShareFile has multiple features to ensure that the right information is being sent with the file so the end receiver has the pertinent information when the file …
Chose Progress ShareFile
I like ShareFile much better than Mango Practice Management. I think the navigation is much more intuitive and user-friendly.
Features
ArcanoProgress ShareFile
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Arcano
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
File search00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
Arcano
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
9.1
Ratings
5% above category average
User and role management00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
File organization00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Device management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
Arcano
-
Ratings
Progress ShareFile
8.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Performance00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Reliability00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Storage Reports00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ArcanoProgress ShareFile
Small Businesses
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 3.9 out of 10
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 3.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ArcanoProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ArcanoProgress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Progress ShareFile has been a great tool for sharing files. When you send to outside people they get an easy link to click on to download the needed files. On the sender side you get options to have the person do things logon to get the file, just enter a name and email address, or just click on the link and download. There are hooks to use other tools to scan for personal information like SSN or credit card numbers. Many of our users use email to send and store emails. They have found that clicking on a link to get a file adds a bit of complexity but many have learned how to adjust to the change.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • I think that one of ShareFile's greatest strengths is its ease of use. With the outlook plug-in sharing large documents is so quick and easy.
  • I also like the security and control that is provided for who can access the documents and tracking the changes within them. I think it does well at protecting information that leaves the company.
  • I also think the website is well organized and easy to use. It was very easy for us to implement and train our employees on the proper use of the website and software.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Users grow quickly (each client gets a separate account). Automated pruning would be nice.
  • I'm not aware of integration with Office365 online (only the outlook app). This could make it harder for some users.
  • It would be nice to have something that auto-scans emails and attachments for PII and would require Sharefile for those emails.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It's a highly effective and secure storage system, has robust workarounds for serving the various equipment limits of our users, meets high security requirements of HIPAA standards, significantly reduces our needs for producing paper trails.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Some of the clunkiness in the user interface and the processing of documents could be made more seamless. However, once you get over that learning curve, it's straightforward enough. The API for integrating external systems is well documented, and the support crew is great at getting you over the rough spots. There's nothing bad about their system, just a few things I thought could be more elegant.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
The software has never been down when I needed to use it.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Easy to use, easy to integrate with Outlook. I only gave it a 9 because I have found that sometimes it does not play nicely with Outlook and can slow it down. But, when that happens (not frequent), I restart Outlook and all is well again
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Typically the support is very knowledgeable and interested in following an issue until it is fully resolved. I have not had any issues working with their staff as they are all polite and easy to communicate with. If the first or second level tech does not fix the concern then it is escalated until we get to someone who can close the case.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Good documentation for the API. With a little help from RS tech staff, any competent programmer should be able to integrate RightSignature with an existing system in a week or three. That help is easy to get as well
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
ShareFile offers more professional level services, and doesn't constantly "run out" of space, forcing you to upgrade to continue. When doing a cost comparison, the competitors may seem cheaper at first, but by the time you add on the features to make it comparable, the pricing is as much, if not more, than what we're paying for ShareFile. The access control level is better with ShareFile, so we chose to stay with them.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I am a one person office. I have no idea how this software would scale to a larger office.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • All of our clients and consulting engineers find ShareFile easy to use, thus complementing our business.
  • Our staff also find ShareFile intuitive, accessible, and easy to use, making it an ideal, everyday indispensable desktop tool for everyone in our company.
  • ShareFile can be linked to our firm's primary website as a placed for private use. We haven't found need for this yet, but might in the future.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Progress ShareFile Screenshots

Screenshot of the ShareFile dashboardScreenshot of ShareFile's Outlook PluginScreenshot of the Projects interfaceScreenshot of ShareFile's link sharing optionsScreenshot of ShareFile's e-signature