Arctera Enterprise Vault vs. Informatica Data Archive (legacy) vs. Smarsh

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arctera Enterprise Vault
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Arctera Enterprise Vault is a file archiving option.N/A
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Informatica Data Archive is used to control data growth in production databases and retire legacy applications. It is a legacy product and will not receive further updates.N/A
Smarsh
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
The Smarsh Enterprise Platform is a unified, cloud-native solution designed to future-proof enterprise communications data strategies. Its technologies include elastic compute, natural language processing, machine learning and artificial intelligence.N/A
Pricing
Arctera Enterprise VaultInformatica Data Archive (legacy)Smarsh
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arctera Enterprise VaultInformatica Data Archive (legacy)Smarsh
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arctera Enterprise VaultInformatica Data Archive (legacy)Smarsh
Considered Multiple Products
Arctera Enterprise Vault
Chose Arctera Enterprise Vault
VE is Very robust and has a good granularity on the archiving rules. The IE shortcuts allowed us to quickly and easily archive the data while allowing users to still access their data via the web. Have great speed of archiving data and your frontend is easier for users. The …
Chose Arctera Enterprise Vault
At the time we first implemented Enterprise Vault, there were no other significant players on the data archiving market.
Chose Arctera Enterprise Vault
We evaluated Z Technologies and EMC archiving solutions. EMC archiving solution was not cohesive at the time. They had one for mail archiving and another product for file services archiving. I wanted a single solution targeting different platforms so that additional storage …
Chose Arctera Enterprise Vault
I haven't research any other software against Enterprise Vault. Office 365 automatically has archiving capabilities that we use in the cloud. In comparison to Office 365, I'd say Office 365 comes out on top. For one thing, we essentially don't have to manage it. It also seems …
Chose Arctera Enterprise Vault
Using Enterprise Vault means having a system that is not directly integrated in your backups, and not tied to the upgrade kadence of your backup systems is nice. With Commvault or other backup driven software the upgrade cycle and user experience is not always tied to the …
Chose Arctera Enterprise Vault
We acquired servers from another company through an acquisition that had McAfee installed. It was difficult to manage any of the clients connected and the management server itself had to be restarted on a daily basis. I am aware of an alternative product known as Trend Micro, …
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
Chose Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
[The] customer support is quite good. Cost also has another point to add, along with process integration and ease of using new tool.
Chose Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
My company currently uses Hadoop for big data management, as well as ParAccel/Matrix databases for storing the data. The combo is fairly effective, and the only reason we are exploring ILM is because of our use of other Informatica products, and looking to build in either …
Smarsh
Chose Smarsh
This was the only appliance of its kind that I have used. Other devices have different capabilities for web filtering such as the checkpoint firewalls, but none of them offered the overall solution that was deployed with this product at that time.
Best Alternatives
Arctera Enterprise VaultInformatica Data Archive (legacy)Smarsh
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arctera Enterprise VaultInformatica Data Archive (legacy)Smarsh
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arctera Enterprise VaultInformatica Data Archive (legacy)Smarsh
Likelihood to Recommend
It is not linked to a specific hardware component and can be installed on any platform. It is a perfect solution for basically all companies and the user experience is simple and easy to use. Another positive point is that it has become the best solution for archiving emails and secret documents. The points of attention revolve around the cost for companies with many users. If there is no planning, it can become a major cost.
Read full review
To manage users, go to the admin dashboard, here is a section for users. In this users section here you can see which users are configured and you have the ability to suspend a user. If you want to edit or add users, you need to go to the Organization section, then click on another user section there, which then gives you the ability to edit or add users.
Read full review
This appliance is well suited for organizations that have a need to monitor, moderate, or log social networking site use or the use of any website. It is a very solid tool for any information security department to have at their disposal.
Read full review
Pros
  • EV FSA had 2 stubbing options. We ended up using the IE shortcut as the stub replacement on the file system. In the DFS environment using DFSR the IE shortcuts allowed us to quickly and easily archive the data while allowing users to still access their data via the web or stub format. We were also able to exclude certain folders from archiving like the dfsrprivate folder. The newer versions of EV 11 and up have a better user interface to access this content from the web.
  • EV SharePoint implementation was pretty simple for us. Document Library archiving was pretty seamless. Archiving the different versions in sharepoint also helped further reduce total cost of storage.
  • EV Exchange was a good addition to our archiving portfolio. In our case we did not use the stubbing mechanism. Instead, we used the vault cache methodology. We had the option to pull down the full archive versus just the header information. The concern at the time was how quickly we could update the vault cache on the client. We ended up scaling out our EV environment to ensure the push of data could get to all our clients since we were in the middle of a notes to exchange migration. Overall I was impressed with Vault Cache and its capabilities. I also liked the ability to manage the Vault Cache and perform resets where necessary from the web browser interface.
  • We had EV FSA, SharePoint and Exchange as one single environment so we benefited from overall single instances of a file. Our backend systems were Netapp which we enabled deduplication for further improve storage savings. EV had a good SQL Reporting mechanism for Archiving and plenty of good canned reports.
  • Speed of archiving data was pretty fast.
Read full review
  • It's not a major problem, but it's an example of one of many small annoyances.
  • Also, there is no proper documentation available
Read full review
  • Discovery: It allows for easy discoveries by the compliance and cyber security departments.
  • Ethical walls: This keeps certain departments from talking to each other.
  • Very granular control. This is a big product meaning you can get very detailed with it.
  • Once it's configured and running, we hardly ever have any issues.
Read full review
Cons
  • Paging through archives can be time consuming. The software seems slow at this. This was possibly related to our own server performance.
  • There are a lot of options to expand out in the tree. It can be overwhelming at first.
Read full review
  • No [suggestions for] improvement as such we amazed with the performance and the services
  • Standalone not integrated with power center
Read full review
  • Its configuration options were very large and required a good deal of time to learn all of the various settings.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Symantec Enterprise is one of the best in the industry. We have already deployed their product to thousands of devices in the company and it would be a huge project to go through and change to an alternative product. We have also had much luck in dealing with their customer support. They have been very pleasant to deal with and their technical support has been quite knowledgeable in fixing our issues. This leaves us with very little reason to switch to a new product. We would have to see a significant amount of cost savings to switch to an alternative that offers all the same features and modules.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
It's the only product at this time that meets all of our requirements.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Using Enterprise Vault means having a system that is not directly integrated in your backups, and not tied to the upgrade kadence of your backup systems is nice. With CommVault or other backup driven software the upgrade cycle and user experience is not always tied to the desktop products so users can be left using older versions. In addition, CommVault and other backup based software often does not have good litigation hold and search tools.
Read full review
My company currently uses Hadoop for big data management, as well as ParAccel/Matrix databases for storing the data. The combo is fairly effective, and the only reason we are exploring ILM is because of our use of other Informatica products, and looking to build in either synergies between the technologies, or cost savings by bundling all our licensing through one vendor (Informatica)
Read full review
This was the only appliance of its kind that I have used. Other devices have different capabilities for web filtering such as the checkpoint firewalls, but none of them offered the overall solution that was deployed with this product at that time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Helps on the data management life-cycle, moving unused data to cheaper storage and/or deleting it after some time, if required.
  • Also helps reducing the amount of data to be backed up on the active array.
Read full review
  • Tracking the usage of specific brackets of data across the entire organisation has now become possible.
  • The team was already using PowerCenter. Therefore, using ILM was a very apt decision that allowed easier management of data at the organisation level.
Read full review
  • Faster investigative work has led to increased employee efficiency when working on security investigations.
Read full review
ScreenShots