Armor vs. IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator

Armor

26 Reviews and Ratings

IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Armor	Score6 out of 10	N/A	Armor is a cloud and mobile security solution. The vendor’s value proposition is that this solution was purpose-built to deliver the highest level of defense and control for an organization’s critical data, no matter where it’s hosted. The vendor says they are so confident in the ability of their solution to protect an organization’s data that they back it with their Cyber Warranty Guarantee.	N/A
IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator	N/A	N/A	IBM® Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator (Offline Signing Orchestrator or OSO for short) is a cold storage solution on IBM LinuxONE and Linux on Z, which brokers communications between two different applications that are designed not to communicate directly. Due to the level of isolation between applications there is no network connection which eliminates the network attack vector. OSO leverages encrypted in-memory communication that is unidirectional and is based on IBM…	N/A

Pricing

Armor

IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Armor	IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

Contact a local IBM Sales Representative for more information.

Best Alternatives
	Armor	IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Trend Micro Deep Security Score9 out of 10	Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10
Enterprises	AWS CloudTrail Score8.8 out of 10	Checkmarx Score7.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Armor	IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend	7.7 (13 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	7.8 (13 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Armor	IBM Hyper Protect Offline Signing Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend	Armor Armor gives you what you need to be successful regardless of technical ability. If you can maintain the systems yourself, you are definitely ahead of the game with their service. If you're not prepared to configure and maintain the systems, they do a pretty good job of getting it set up during the onboarding process so that you don't need to dig into the technical guts too much. If you find yourself in over your head, their support staff can handle it for you in most cases. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	IBM No answers on this topic
Pros	Armor Security - we have requirements met right out of the box and the implementation of new resources is done with security in mind. Speed - We can scale resources easy and the infrastructure is fast and efficient. Responsiveness - Support tickets are handled very fast with almost immediate solutions. Incentivized LJ Wilson Senior Software Engineer Team Lead Read full review	IBM No answers on this topic
Cons	Armor Authentication and access against the secure messaging portal is overkill when the response I'm logging in to see merely says, "yes, we have your message. An agent will respond shortly". There should be an option to receive updates like this through email. The online portal that allows us to clone servers is very slow to respond. More than once I've spun up an additional server due to the lack of visual feedback on the initial request. The web application firewall does not seem to be sophisticated enough to differentiate between logged in administrators and end users. We use a CMS system which allows admins to create scripts. These often get barred by the WAF even though they are not malicious. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	IBM No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Armor Approximately 50% of all messages we receive are automated. Either that an agent will be assigned, has been assigned, or a ticket is closed. I'd like to see more 'real' interaction, and less box ticking, though I appreciate process has to be followed. That's the one point off. Everything else is very good. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	IBM No answers on this topic
ScreenShots