Ascertra Mpower Project Controls vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mpower Project Controls
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Mpower enterprise project controls and cost management software from Ascertra helps project-based organizations accurately control, measure, and predict project performance.N/A
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
Ascertra Mpower Project ControlsVena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mpower Project ControlsVena
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ascertra Mpower Project ControlsVena
Considered Both Products
Mpower Project Controls

No answer on this topic

Vena
Chose Vena
We went with Vena as the alternatives felt like everything was contained in the box, and would have required more IT department assistance than we had bandwidth for.
Chose Vena
Vena is much better for customization and data representation. It gives us much more flexibility in how we show our information to stakeholders. We need our information to be digestible for non-financial employees, and with that flexibility to show things how we want, we are …
Chose Vena
we did our diligence when selecting Vena. I do not want to disparage other products so I will not list them. However, we were extremely thorough and gauged all offerings on multiple criteria. Big players and small players. We are very happy with our Decision to go with Vena.
Chose Vena
Oracle is more clunky and prone to stats breaking while Vena is more streamlined.
Chose Vena
Solver was more user friendly in the report building, but Vena has more functionalities
Chose Vena
My experience was that OneStream lacked driver-based planning. I still had to build models in excel and then upload my numbers into OneStream.
Chose Vena
Vena was much easier to implement, and more user friendly
Chose Vena
Vena has a much more arsenal of AI features.
Chose Vena
we liked that Vena was fully integrated into Excel and we were already doing all our manual work within excel and creating all our reports and templates so we thought that only made sense to use Vena as it was most comfortable for us
Chose Vena
We selected Vena due to it being Excel based.
Chose Vena
I think from the finance perspective specifically, Vena is more clear and easy to read. Besides, the report that Vena generates is more reliable and realistic in our case. But we do integrate the data from Workday to Vena every month. So we use the both platforms for our …
Chose Vena
We selected Vena because the product worked in Excel, so there was less of a training curve for people, because all of other people work with cell users and we also chose it better because of the people, the sales reps, and the implementation teams. You know, the processes that …
Chose Vena
Vena is Excel-based, which is what our users wanted. Pigment was web-based, like Adaptive, but our users did not fully trust or adopt it. Adoption drives success for any software. Amy's software, which is not adopted, has a negative ROI by definition. Vena was the right choice …
Chose Vena
Playful is complex and not user friendly. There was no customer support so we had to pay a third party consultant and it was expensive
Chose Vena
Vena has more capabilities that we saw during demos
Chose Vena
The main reason was because Vena was Excel based and would allow us to replicate our budget templates and limit the change management for our users
Chose Vena
Vena is more customizable in my opinion
Chose Vena
I didn’t have an option in which one to go with but I have looked at others. It has stacked up well but I would want more scenario analysis and predictive analytics that some of the other products offer.
Chose Vena
Vena being excel based is the what sets it apart from tableau and makes it very easy for finance professionals to be self sufficient when needing reports. Tableau can be very difficult to use for a finance person and typically requires some sort of tech help. Being able to …
Features
Ascertra Mpower Project ControlsVena
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
Ratings
1% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
Ratings
4% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Ascertra Mpower Project Controls
-
Ratings
Vena
8.1
Ratings
0% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Ascertra Mpower Project ControlsVena
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ascertra Mpower Project ControlsVena
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ascertra Mpower Project ControlsVena
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Vena suited to our environment because we do have so many different budget owners that are in so many different places in our organization and for them to all be able to go onto the software and bring it down in two native Excel where they are all used to work in Excel and putting in the line items and pieces that go with their budget is super helpful a scenario where it might not be as helpful is when we are bringing people on and trying to teach them how to report and map because we struggle with that so much ourselves that it is a difficult situation to try to get people to understand things that we’re you know may be struggling to understand ourselves.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • What i like best about Vena is that it is very seamless Excel integration.
  • Vena fosters collabs across teams, helping multiple members to work together on financial planning in real-time enhancing overall efficiency.
  • We now also can automate manual processes like budgeting, consolidation of data and reporting saves my valuable time and also reducing the risk of errors.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Create an bottom-line functionality.
  • Have another license between power user and contributor that allows building reports that aren't ad hoc, but don't have all the admin rights of a power user.
  • Have a session on best in class Workforce Planning prior to implementation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Vena has become an integral part of finance and our daily process. Without it we would take longer to prepare results and decisions will be delayed. Vena has given the whole organization more visibility of results and budgets so that all departments participate more actively in managing their budgets rather than it being the sole responsibility of finance.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's very usable in the sense that it is what you make it. You can keep your Excel spreadsheets as they are then then add Vena's cloud saving capability on top of it or you can take their out of the box templates and apply them to your business. It's truly a super customizable and is what you make of it
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Vena is seemingly always available. They plan maintenance windows well in advance and always off hours (typically over a weekend) and communicate clearly throughout maintenance about what will be affected. Over 5 years of using the product, I can only remember one time when the platform was unavailable (I believe due to an underlying server hosting issue from their provider), and they resolved the issue and had everything up and running again within 8 hours.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The performance is dependent on how much data and calculations are involved and how complex the security settings are. A simple template or report loads in seconds. A complex template or report can take a while. If there are many users with complex security settings, that will be a factor in the load time.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I will give Vena credit for at least trying and being initially responsive. However, it is clear that their attitude toward development is cavalier. We have engaged them both via helpdesk and on consulting engagements. The solutions provided are often given without proper testing, resulting in significant time spent on back-and-forth to get issues resolved, or fixing the code yourself. There does not seem to be much in the way of process or project management on their side for customer engagements.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
This is the best way to learn and buy-in. The in person effect gives students both a hands on approach but an instruction to be there to customize assistance and understanding. In person also builds greater buy in with your future team on creators. However if your audience is better at on line learning this is another good option.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Vena is much better for customization and data representation. It gives us much more flexibility in how we show our information to stakeholders. We need our information to be digestible for non-financial employees, and with that flexibility to show things how we want, we are more efficient at getting the point across.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard