What users are saying about
1 Rating
15 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.3 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • AspenONE Engineering is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

8.0

AspenONE Engineering

80%
2 Ratings
7.0

gINT

70%
1 Rating

Usability

9.0

AspenONE Engineering

90%
1 Rating

gINT

N/A
0 Ratings

Support Rating

8.0

AspenONE Engineering

80%
1 Rating

gINT

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

AspenONE Engineering

In enterprises where another project is tailored to the needs of the client rather than using basic tools. And where the estimate requires comprehensive cost buckets for production operations. When there is a large amount of purchasing history to enter into AspenONE Engineering in order for it to provide reliable projections. Standard equipment manufacturing enterprises are not well suited. Also, because this instrument requires time, when there are time limitation and resource or human limitations.
Hamim Khan | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

AspenONE Engineering

  • Once an estimate is made, it can be simply copied and modified for another similar equipment estimate
  • ACCE can be customized per the company's requirements
  • Templates for each equipment style can be made and can be used repeatedly
  • Very detailed reporting, of each cost segment like steel, electrical, civil, instruments is available for analysis
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

AspenONE Engineering

  • The User Guide is far too large to browse and learn from.
  • Documentation is detailed while also being complicated.
  • Any modifications that need to be made will take a long time.
Hamim Khan | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

AspenONE Engineering

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

gINT

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

Usability

AspenONE Engineering

AspenONE Engineering 9.0
Based on 1 answer
We began assessing several tools when we began estimating for a full process plant or various styles of equipment. We also investigated implementing an ERP system used by the sales and item engineering departments.
Hamim Khan | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

AspenONE Engineering

AspenONE Engineering 8.0
Based on 1 answer
The support team is always available for help. They are agile and cheerful.
Hamim Khan | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

AspenONE Engineering

Again answering from the ACCE perspective (Estimating tool) - Previously when we did estimates for simple equipment we had used excel estimates and lotus reporting. However, as we started estimating for an entire process plant or various style of equipment, we had started evaluating various tools. We had also considered using an ERP system that is utilized by Purchasing and Product Engineering teams, however, ACCE seemed a better fit for the amount of detailed estimating needed. And the robustness and various options available made us select this tool.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

AspenONE Engineering

  • Investment apart from the cost of tool, is time - It is very time taking to obtain the results required
  • We are being trained by a professional consultant on ACCE, and yet to see the ROI
  • Detailed estimates as needed by Product Engineering is a plus
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Add comparison