What users are saying about
1 Rating
13 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.5 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

AspenONE Engineering

Answering where ACCE can be used - In Organizations, where each and every project is customized per customer requirements, and not just standard equipment. And where product engineering needs detailed cost buckets in the estimate. Also when there is a lot of purchase history to feed into ACCE to give accurate estimates. Not well suited for standard equipment manufacturing companies. Also when there are time crunches and resource or manpower shortages - as this tool needs time.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

AspenONE Engineering

  • User-friendly
  • Works well for defining hypothetical components especially those of crude oil mixtures
  • Can design and rate heat exchanges and air coolers
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

AspenONE Engineering

  • I haven't seen many tutorials available, especially videos
  • User Guide is too vast to explore and learn
  • Reporting is detailed but is also complex at the same time.
  • If any changes are to be made, then it involves a lot of time.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

AspenONE Engineering

User-friendly. Can define and estimate close properties of some crude oil mixtures and hypothetical components. Can run some detailed calculations on shell and tube heat exchangers and air-cooled heat exchangers. Not just rating and sizing, but also can perform capital cost estimates. It is a single tool for design, sizing and estimating.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

AspenONE Engineering

  • Investment apart from the cost of tool, is time - It is very time taking to obtain the results required
  • We are being trained by a professional consultant on ACCE, and yet to see the ROI
  • Detailed estimates as needed by Product Engineering is a plus
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

gINT

  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

AspenONE Engineering

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

gINT

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison