Assembla vs. AWS CodeCommit

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Assembla
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Assembla provides a cloud-based source code management (SCM) Platform that covers Perforce, Apache Subversion (SVN), and Git. Their managed cloud hosting solutions are designed for both small and enterprise software development teams. They offer a turn-key cloud hosting solution that covers both Perforce and infrastructure management. This includes design and managed dedicated server network. And Assembla's Subversion Enterprise offers Assembla Cloud features on a dedicated, high-performance…
$19
per month per user
AWS CodeCommit
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It is designed to make it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem.
$1
Per Month Per User beyond the fifth
Pricing
AssemblaAWS CodeCommit
Editions & Modules
Subversion Cloud
$19
per month per user
Perforce Cloud
$52.25
per month (12 month term) per user
Perforce Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Subversion Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Subscription
$1.00
Per Month Per User beyond the fifth
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AssemblaAWS CodeCommit
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AssemblaAWS CodeCommit
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
AssemblaAWS CodeCommit
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AssemblaAWS CodeCommit
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AssemblaAWS CodeCommit
Likelihood to Recommend
Idera Software
Assembla works well when you are working with multiple groups or entities. We dealt with different time zones, different levels of involvement with the projects, etc so this allows for us to have responses back in a quicker fashion. It also helps us clue in the appropriate people and rely less on following multiple email chains
Read full review
Amazon AWS
Non-cloud users often complain about CodeCommit because it is so barebones, which it is. However, I believe that is by design. It is not supposed to be a full-fledged AI integrated GitLab alternative. Once users or developers get over the learning curve and required Cloud dependency, CodeCommit is a great service that offers a perfect complement / augmentation to on prem options. It is ideal for Cloud-native deployments where the code and production service are close together.
Read full review
Pros
Idera Software
  • Assembla assists in the workload balancing of our programmers.
  • We are able to use Assembla to manage sprints and sprint planning in our agile format.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • Lightweight
  • Native IAM integration
  • Collaboration
  • High Availability
Read full review
Cons
Idera Software
  • The ability to export the tasks or run metrics on them.
  • Mobile ability.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • Integration with non-Cloud services
  • Learning curve for devs
  • Barebones
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Idera Software
We selected Assembla because the ticket functionality worked well with our agile planning format that we use company wide.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
CodeCommit is a cloud native solution where GitHub is typically run on prem which requires a team to manage the physical servers and the software on top of it. CodeCommit is a better choice when doing Cloud focused workloads. GitHub Copilot offers more features than the leaner CodeCommit, however does not have the same integration options
Read full review
Return on Investment
Idera Software
  • We were able to spend less time tracking down the status of projects.
  • We could become more self-sufficient on reviewing prior resolutions to help with current problems.
  • Tasks were responded to quickly because we did not have to email one person, wait for an out of office email and then try someone else. Our task got assigned to the next available person.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
  • 20% reduction in traffic to on-prem GitHub
  • No additional server capacity required
  • No overhead or maintainance
Read full review
ScreenShots