athenaOne vs. Cerner Practice Management

Very well suited for outpatient multi-specialty clinics. May not be perfect for hospital based practices, but I am not in a position to say that with conviction as we are not hospital based organization.

Incentivized

Well suited in the clinical setting although a little tedious. Not suited in many other places.

Incentivized

• Very easy to keep track of quality measures.
• Easy to track suspect conditions, care gaps.
• Easy to review performance of providers across the whole organization.

Incentivized

• Scheduling - I personally enjoy the ease of use with the solution. It also has a great "memory" as to patient rescheduling, no shows, etc. Being able to create multiple schedules to reflect different practitioners is such a major plus in this system.
• Customization - I am able to create Super-bills, Global Periods, and Insurance Details pertinent to each patient and not have to RECREATE them every time like I had to in past systems.
• EOB - an added bonus is the ability for the system to check EOB ahead of time. This is a HUGE time saving in an office!

Incentivized

• At this point I can not think of anything that I am missing.

Incentivized

• Only seems applicable for small organizations.

Incentivized

Everything within the system works smoothly, it’s just time-consuming and could be a bit more simplistic.

Incentivized

SOAPWARE, Centricity, Amazing charts

Incentivized

I personally would use this system over any other systems currently on the market. Athena has a nice product...however, it can be quite expensive and the colors are draining on the eyes. eClinical Works also has a system that is comparable, but the customization I found wasn't as easy as the Cerner product

Incentivized

• At least 2-3% increase in revenue collection.
• Timely note completion rate went up.
• Increase in payments from insurers for P4P.

Incentivized