Autodesk Construction Cloud vs. RDash

Well Suited: Autodesk Construction Cloud is cost effective, user friendly, and robust. They aren't nickel and diming you for use of each module. Once users are on-board with the system it creates an ecosystem that all users "go to first" for an answer. Less Appropriate: As a Developer, there are some hiccups as it is designed more for the GC (general contractor). A template option that is Developer forward would an improvement.

Incentivized

• Meeting Minutes: Simple to use and adapt from Agenda to Minutes, attach reference documents efficiently, and assign accountability to attendees.
• Budget/Cost Reporting: There is a learning curve, but the visibility of budgets and costs from inception to closeout is beneficial for the user and makes reporting to investors simple and consistent.
• Document Management: The version history on drawings "sheets" is very helpful when managing a project through design and construction. Issuing addenda, drawings, or tracking down a change in design is simple.
• Pay Applications/Change Order Workflow: the customizable workflows along with time stamps of reviews and response makes tracking down status and bottlenecks very easy.

Incentivized

• Interface of drawing sheets, very jagged and slow moving through sheets
• Ability to export punchlist to a cleaner excel spreadsheet
• Deficiency tracking

Incentivized

I don't make these decisions and its what the company wants

It is better than some platforms out there, but some significant issues hold it back. Reliability is not good, user setup is not intuitive, and the sheet viewer itself is very slow to load and change pages.

5 major outages in the last year, some on days of major deliverables or deadlines... dependent upon AWS

The data mitigation is complete garbage. Any cloud collaborated model takes 2x to load in the Autodesk Construction Cloud environment that if it was saved locally or to on prem servers. We had our systems and bandwidth all evaluated to be applicable but the data downloads and sequencing through Desktop Connector leaves much to be desired.

Autodesk staff intervention often required to support IT when normal installs and direction was erroneous

Great to have hands on folks to answer questions. Live training worked better for real time scenarios.

Good as any other online content, not incredible. There was a cost associated with this training

Be prepared for nothing to work originally, and support staff to fight change and be cumbersome at properly learning how to use in my opinion.

Autodesk Construction Cloud Stacks up to all other applications very nicely. Much of my previous experience was with Autodesk products so the learning curve was not very steep. BIM 360 was our previous application used and Autodesk Construction Cloud provides all the same features plus many more. I am excited that Autodesk Construction Cloud is constantly developing and creating new features.

Incentivized

Not applicable/harder to implement across larger workforces or large-scale projects

• Make us easier to manage files
• Coordination model more easier
• Keep internal file secret to external by managing access to our Autodesk Construction Cloud system

Incentivized