AutomationHQ vs. BlazeMeter

AutomationHQ

1 Reviews and Ratings

BlazeMeter

25 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
AutomationHQ	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	AutomationHQ™ (AHQ) is a complete TAAS (Test Automation As Service) solution. Its NLP driven, cloud-based No-Code test automation platform is presented as ideal for agile delivery team. Any one in agile team can develop In-Sprint test automation in plain English with AHQ. User can create virtual test robots in AHQ and assign test scripts to them. These test robots works as virtual testers for the agile team. TestBots can be executed on…	$69 per month Organisation
BlazeMeter	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform, supported by Broadcom since the acquisition of CA Technologies in 2018 and now by Perforce since the September 2021 acquisition, provides scriptless test automation, as well as unified functional and performance testing. It allows users to test and monitor public, private, and 3rd party APIs, and is deployable as a SaaS, or deployed from a private cloud.	$199 per month

Pricing

AutomationHQ

BlazeMeter

Editions & Modules

Startup & E-commerce Package: $69
per month Organisation

Basic: $149.00
per month
Pro: $649.00
per month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Top Pros	Pro Pre build Pro Test steps Pro Track changes	Pro Open source Pro Faster and easier Pro Load testing
Top Cons	Minus Test cases Minus Version control Minus Run time	Minus Learning curve Minus High learning curve Minus Drill down

Best Alternatives
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 8.1 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (1 ratings)	9.0 (5 ratings)

User Testimonials
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend	AutomationHQ Inc The AutomationHQ tool is well suited for small to medium size projects, but sometimes there is difficulty in the case of complex elements which are present within multiple Iframes. Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	Perforce Software It is well suited for applications that are mission-critical or applications that can receive high traffic/transactions at unscheduled time periods. Using the load testing feature of BlazeMeter, we can test and ascertain the capacity of the application without the drawbacks of the usual Apache JMeter load testing which depends heavily on the host system from where the load testing is performed. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	AutomationHQ Inc The best thing I liked about AutomationHQ is that it intelligently identify web elements and track changes in real-time applications It supports Data driven testing from mainly three data sources from Excel/XML/JSON There are myriad pre-build test steps, which we can use to built our own scripts. Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	Perforce Software Results are easy to read Tests can be run easily Tests can ben imported easily from jMeter Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	AutomationHQ Inc AutomationHQ doesn’t have test cases version control, we have to currently manually do this by copying the test script and [renaming] with the version. I wish AHQ can implement the version control so I don’t have to keep test script copies Complex elements like within multiple iframes have difficulty at run time. It seems we have to run it multiple time until AHQ's AI algorithm "learn" what is the right way Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	Perforce Software BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests. BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package. BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	AutomationHQ Inc Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	Perforce Software Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	AutomationHQ Inc We have received gains for about 150% over a long period of time Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	Perforce Software It helped positively by helping to identify the maximum capacity needed for high traffic periods Saved revenue by eliminating unwanted duplication of systems Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	AutomationHQ Screenshots