AWS Auto Scaling vs. NGINX
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS Auto Scaling | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | AWS Auto Scaling monitors applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. The vendor states that using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. | N/A |
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
| AWS Auto Scaling | NGINX | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS Auto Scaling | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 98% Would buy again 49 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | |
| AWS Auto Scaling | NGINX | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS Auto Scaling | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Score8.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Apache HTTP Server Score9.7 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Score8.2 out of 10 | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS Auto Scaling | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 8.3 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| AWS Auto Scaling | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |











