AWS Batch vs. CA Workload Automation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Batch
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
With AWS Batch, users package the code for batch jobs, specify dependencies, and submit batch jobs using the AWS Management Console, CLIs, or SDKs. AWS Batch allows users to specify execution parameters and job dependencies, and facilitates integration with a broad range of popular batch computing workflow engines and languages (e.g., Pegasus WMS, Luigi, Nextflow, Metaflow, Apache Airflow, and AWS Step Functions).N/A
CA Workload Automation
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
As the name may suggest, CA Workload Automation is CA Technologies workload automation offering.N/A
Pricing
AWS BatchCA Workload Automation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS BatchCA Workload Automation
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
AWS BatchCA Workload Automation
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
AWS Batch
7.7
6 Ratings
6% below category average
CA Workload Automation
9.4
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Multi-platform scheduling8.35 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Central monitoring7.75 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Logging7.35 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Alerts and notifications8.15 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Analysis and visualization6.05 Ratings8.84 Ratings
Application integration8.76 Ratings8.94 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS BatchCA Workload Automation
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 8.6 out of 10
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS BatchCA Workload Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(6 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS BatchCA Workload Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
More appropriate if you have a tech group that can use more of the AWS Batch rather than one or 2 things. It works great for me, but there was a huge learning curve the first week of using it. Now, I love it - and I hope to dig deep into other parts not just S3.
Read full review
Broadcom
CA Workload Automation is well suited for firms having to manage and monitor multiple applications operating in multiple environments. and having SLA requirements. CA Workload Automation is less appropriate and not cost-effective for non-critical applications and/or jobs. CA Workload Automation is ideal for companies that require reliable and stable Production support for their business critical jobs to finish on time.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • S3 amount of files
  • Easy to share files to other sites
  • Like that the files and folders can be open and public or completely private
  • I like that you can have double or mirroring in different Data Centers for Data Recovery
Read full review
Broadcom
  • All batch jobs can be monitored from one dashboard.
  • Provides detailed error logs.
  • We have developed packages to invoke OIC integrations through Autosys.
  • Notifications is a good feature when job fails or runs beyond cutoff time.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Jobs monitoring dashboards are not matured
  • Documentation and support is something which can be improved
  • Sometime i faced the slow response or slow in performance i would say
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Monitoring of front-end websites.
  • More utilization insights if possible.
  • Customer service via chat in the future if possible.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
Very happy!
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
It would be great if customer chat experience is also readily available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
We wanted to start everything on a scale & with fewer resources to manage the underlying infrastructure.
Read full review
Broadcom
We selected CA Workload Automation for the ease of integration and less time to setup. It has less overhead to manage the application and is a very robust application.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Overall over business is able to save the cost
  • Saved our times to improve the existing process
  • Able to integrate with other applications as well, so that is plus point
Read full review
Broadcom
  • CA Workload Automation has improved SLA by 50%.
  • CA Workload Automation has reduced job failures by 60%.
  • CA Workload Automation has improved staff productivity and problem resolution.
  • CA Workload Automation has improved application availability.
Read full review
ScreenShots