Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS CloudFormation | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | AWS CloudFormation gives developers and systems administrators a way to create and manage a collection of related AWS resources, provisioning and updating them in a predictable fashion. Use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run an application. Users don’t need to figure out the order for provisioning AWS services or the subtleties of making those dependencies work.… | $0 |
![]() Azure Cloud Services | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Azure Cloud Services is a cloud platform that enables users to create infinitely-scalable cloud applications and APIs. It enables users to build the web and cloud applications needed while also simplifying the management of applications with cloud services, and while ensuring high availability. Users can: scale an environment automatically based on demand and reduce costs, automate operating system and application updates to increase security, and take advantage of integrated health monitoring… | $0.02 per hour |
Ansible | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it. | $5,000 per year |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure Cloud Services | Ansible | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no additional charge for using AWS CloudFormation with resource providers in the following namespaces: AWS::*, Alexa::*, and Custom::*. In this case you pay for AWS resources (such as Amazon EC2 instances, Elastic Load Balancing load balancers, etc.) created using AWS CloudFormation as if you created them manually. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no required upfront commitments. When you use resource providers with AWS CloudFormation outside the namespaces mentioned above, you incur charges per handler operation. Handler operations are create, update, delete, read, or list actions on a resource. | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure Cloud Services | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | 99% Would buy again 265 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | 96% Delivers good value for the price 210 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
86% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | 98% Happy with the feature set 263 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 166 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 89% Implementation went as expected 201 Answers | |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure Cloud Services | Ansible | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure Cloud Services | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | HashiCorp Vagrant Score9 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Terraform Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | Perforce Puppet Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Terraform Score8.7 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure Cloud Services | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | - | 9.2 |
| Usability | 8.0 | 9.0 | 8.3 |
| Performance | - | - | 8.7 |
| Support Rating | - | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | - | 8.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | - | 8.6 |
| AWS CloudFormation | Azure Cloud Services | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
| ![]()
|
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots | AWS CloudFormation Screenshots |