AWS CloudFormation vs. Progress Chef vs. HyScale
AWS CloudFormation vs. Progress Chef vs. HyScale
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS CloudFormation | N/A | AWS CloudFormation gives developers and systems administrators a way to create and manage a collection of related AWS resources, provisioning and updating them in a predictable fashion. Use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run an application. Users don’t need to figure out the order for provisioning AWS services or the subtleties of making those dependencies work.… | $0 | |
Progress Chef | N/A | Chef IT infrastructure automation suites were developed by Chef Software in Seattle and acquired by Progress Software in September 2020. The Chef Enterprise Automation Stack is an integrated suite of automation technologies presented as a solution for delivering change quickly, repeatedly, and securely over every application's lifecycle. The Chef Effortless Infrastructure Suit is an integrated suite of automation technologies to codify infrastructure, security, and compliance, as well as… | N/A | |
HyScale | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | HyScale is a visual DevOps platform that aims to fully automate app containerization and enable continuous delivery into any container runtime. According to the vendor, enterprise IT teams can onboard monolithic as well as emerging microservices-based applications by integrating HyScale with existing CI tools like Jenkins (or) using existing shell scripts. HyScale then delivers these applications as containers to any runtime of choice without writing a piece of… | N/A |
| AWS CloudFormation | Progress Chef | HyScale | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no additional charge for using AWS CloudFormation with resource providers in the following namespaces: AWS::*, Alexa::*, and Custom::*. In this case you pay for AWS resources (such as Amazon EC2 instances, Elastic Load Balancing load balancers, etc.) created using AWS CloudFormation as if you created them manually. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no required upfront commitments. When you use resource providers with AWS CloudFormation outside the namespaces mentioned above, you incur charges per handler operation. Handler operations are create, update, delete, read, or list actions on a resource. | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS CloudFormation | Progress Chef | HyScale |
|---|
| AWS CloudFormation | Progress Chef | HyScale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration Management |
|
| AWS CloudFormation | Progress Chef | HyScale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | HashiCorp Terraform Score 8.8 out of 10 | HashiCorp Terraform Score 8.8 out of 10 | HashiCorp Terraform Score 8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 | Ansible Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS CloudFormation | Progress Chef | HyScale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 (7 ratings) | 8.9 (18 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.0 (2 ratings) | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.4 (5 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.7 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - (0 ratings) | 6.4 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 9.6 (5 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Professional Services | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| AWS CloudFormation | Progress Chef | HyScale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Performance | ![]() Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]() Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]() Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Professional Services | ![]() Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]() Amazon AWS
| ![]() Progress Software Corporation
| WaveMaker Inc No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | AWS CloudFormation Screenshots |







