TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Data Exchange

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AAWS Data Exchange is an integration for data service, from which subscribers can easily browse the AWS Data Exchange catalog to find relevant and up-to-date commercial data products covering a wide range of industries, including financial services, healthcare, life sciences, geospatial, consumer, media & entertainment, and more.N/A

    AWS Lambda

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAWS Lambda is a serverless computing platform that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. With Lambda, users can run code for virtually any type of app or backend service—all with zero administration. It takes of requirements to run and scale code with high availability.

    $NaN

    Per 1 ms

    Pricing
    AWS Data ExchangeAWS Lambda
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    128 MB
    $0.0000000021
    Per 1 ms
    1024 MB
    $0.0000000167
    Per 1 ms
    10240 MB
    $0.0000001667
    Per 1 ms
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS Data ExchangeAWS Lambda
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS Data ExchangeAWS Lambda
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    24 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    Features
    AWS Data ExchangeAWS Lambda
    Data Source Connection
    Comparison of Data Source Connection features of AWS Data Exchange and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    AWS Data Exchange
    8.0
    2 Ratings
    5% below category average
    AWS Lambda
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to traditional data sources7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Modeling
    Comparison of Data Modeling features of AWS Data Exchange and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    AWS Data Exchange
    8.2
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    AWS Lambda
    -
    Ratings
    Data model creation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Metadata management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business rules and workflow7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaboration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing and debugging7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Governance
    Comparison of Data Governance features of AWS Data Exchange and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    AWS Data Exchange
    7.0
    1 Ratings
    14% below category average
    AWS Lambda
    -
    Ratings
    Integration with data quality tools7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of AWS Data Exchange and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    AWS Data Exchange
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.57 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of AWS Data Exchange and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    AWS Data Exchange
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    4.9
    6 Ratings
    29% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings5.46 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings5.05 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings4.35 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of AWS Data Exchange and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    AWS Data Exchange
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Programming Language Diversity00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration00 Ratings9.27 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AWS Data ExchangeAWS Lambda
    Small Businesses
    Skyvia
    Score10 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Score10 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SolarWinds Task Factory
    Score8.3 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS Data ExchangeAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.5
    (52 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (17 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS Data ExchangeAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    AWS Data Exchange fits best for scenarios where you have datasets that you would like to sell and you want to deliver it to anyone who would like to purchase it. It really beats having to set up downloads via your own website or portal. However, it can get complicated to manage if you're trying to deliver a dataset a client has already paid for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Lambda excels at event-driven, short-lived tasks, such as processing files or building simple APIs. However, it's less ideal for long-running, computationally intensive, or applications that rely on carrying the state between jobs. Cold starts and constant load can easily balloon the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Simplified data delivery
    • Ability to create any amount of data products
    • Ability to integrate payment plans with data products
    • Tracking data downloads and users
    • Integration with other AWS data services
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • No provisioning required - we don't have to pay anything upfront
    • Serverless deployment - it gets executed only when request comes and we pay only for the time the request is getting executed
    • Integrates well with AWS CloudWatch triggers so it is easy to setup scheduled tasks like cron jobs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Integration with more data sources
    • Ability to deliver data to clients without AWS accounts
    • Inclusion of direct data downloads in addition to asynchronous methods
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Developing test cases for Lambda functions can be difficult. For functions that require some sort of input it can be tough to develop the proper payload and event for a test.
    • For the uninitiated, deploying functions with Infrastructure as Code tools can be a challenging undertaking.
    • Logging the output of a function feels disjointed from running the function in the console. A tighter integration with operational logging would be appreciated, perhaps being able to view function logs from the Lambda console instead of having to navigate over to CloudWatch.
    • Sometimes its difficult to determine the correct permissions needed for Lambda execution from other AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    There have been a lot of problems with ADX. First, the entire system is incredibly clunky from beginning to end.First, by AWS's own admission they're missing a lot of "tablestakes functionality" like the ability to see who is coming to your pages, more flexibility to edit and update your listings, the ability to create a storefront or catalog that actually tries to sell your products. All-in-all you're flying completely blind with AWS. In our convos with other sellers we strongly believe very little organic traffic is flowing through the AWS exchange. For the headache, it's not worth the time or the effort. It's very difficult to market or sell your products.We've also had a number of simple UX bugs where they just don't accurately reflect the attributes of your product. For instance for an S3 bucket they had "+metered costs" displayed to one of our buyers in the price. This of course caused a lot of confusion. They also misrepresented the historical revisions that were available in our product sets because of another UX bug. It's difficult to know what other things in the UX are also broken and incongruent.We also did have a purchase, but the seller is completely at their whim at providing you fake emails, fake company names, fake use cases because AWS hasn't thought through simple workflows like "why even have subscription confirmation if I can fake literally everything about a subscription request." So as a result we're now in an endless, timewasting, unhelpful thread with AWS support trying to get payment. They're confused of what to do and we feel completely lost.Lastly, the AWS team has been abysmal in addressing our concerns. Conversations with them result in a laundry list of excuses of why simple functionalities are so hard (including just having accurate documentation). It was a very frustrating and unproductive call. Our objective of our call was to help us see that ADX is a well-resourced and well-visioned product. Ultimately they couldn't clearly articulate who they built the exchange for both on the seller side and the buyer side.Don't waste your time. This is at best a very foggy experiment. Look at other sellers, they have a lot of free pages to try to get attention, but then have smart tactics to divert transactions away from the ADX. Ultimately, smart move. Why give 8-10% of your cut to a product that is basically bare-bones infrastructure.
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    I give it a seven is usability because it's AWS. Their UI's are always clunkier than the competition and their documentation is rather cumbersome. There's SO MUCH to dig through and it's a gamble if you actually end up finding the corresponding info if it will actually help. Like I said before, going to google with a specific problem is likely a better route because AWS is quite ubiquitous and chances are you're not the first to encounter the problem. That being said, using SAM (Serverless application model) and it's SAM Local environment makes running local instances of your Lambdas in dev environments painless and quite fun. Using Nodejs + Lambda + SAM Local + VS Code debugger = AWESOME.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon consistently provides comprehensive and easy-to-parse documentation of all AWS features and services. Most development team members find what they need with a quick internet search of the AWS documentation available online. If you need advanced support, though, you might need to engage an AWS engineer, and that could be an unexpected (or unwelcome) expense.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    AWS Lambda is good for short running functions, and ideally in response to events within AWS. Google App Engine is a more robust environment which can have complex code running for long periods of time, and across more than one instance of hardware. Google App Engine allows for both front-end and back-end infrastructure, while AWS Lambda is only for small back-end functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Reduced time to publish datasets for sale by more than 80%
    • Increased net profit from dataset sales by ~10%
    • Reduced data delivery time to clients by 15%
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive - Only paying for when code is run, unlike virtual machines where you pay always regardless of processing power usage.
    • Positive - Scalability and accommodating larger amounts of demand is much cheaper. Instead of scaling up virtual machines and increasing the prices you pay for that, you are just increasing the number of times your lambda function is run.
    • Negative - Debugging/troubleshooting, and developing for lambda functions take a bit more time to get used to, and migrating code from virtual machines and normal processes to Lambda functions can take a bit of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots