Overall Satisfaction with AWS Lambda
We use AWS Lambda for running some periodic tasks. We've configured some triggers using AWS CloudWatch Alarms which trigger these Lambdas at certain intervals. This solves our business problem as we don't need to run a separate server for this neither it adds a load on any of the existing servers which are there to serve the requests. It only runs when there is a trigger and we only have to pay for the compute capacity we use.
- No provisioning required - we don't have to pay anything upfront
- Serverless deployment - it gets executed only when request comes and we pay only for the time the request is getting executed
- Integrates well with AWS CloudWatch triggers so it is easy to setup scheduled tasks like cron jobs
- As of now AWS Lambda just works as a function and all other deployment configurations are obscured. This doesn't let us integrate it with other debugging and monitoring tools like Sentry. If AWS Lambda can add support for some external integrations, that would be helpful.
- Also, the lambda_handler function is passed with event and context arguments which can't be constructed locally so local development and testing of AWS Lambda code is difficult as of now. If AWS Lambda adds some support for local development, that would be great.
- We were able to reduce cost as we didn't have to provision a new server like an EC2 instance but only paid for what we used
- Also, because of integration with CloudWatch for triggers, it was easy to schedule the time of invocation and edit the time of invocation when needed
- Because of integration with other AWS services, it is easy to access S3 storage or an RDS database
Do you think AWS Lambda delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with AWS Lambda's feature set?
Yes
Did AWS Lambda live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of AWS Lambda go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy AWS Lambda again?
Yes