TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Lambda

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAWS Lambda is a serverless computing platform that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. With Lambda, users can run code for virtually any type of app or backend service—all with zero administration. It takes of requirements to run and scale code with high availability.

    $NaN

    Per 1 ms

    Google Cloud Functions

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Functions enables users to run code in the cloud with no servers or containers to manage. Cloud Functions is a scalable, pay-as-you-go functions as a service (FaaS) product to help build and connect event driven services with simple, single purpose code.N/A
    Pricing
    AWS LambdaGoogle Cloud Functions
    Editions & Modules
    128 MB
    $0.0000000021
    Per 1 ms
    1024 MB
    $0.0000000167
    Per 1 ms
    10240 MB
    $0.0000001667
    Per 1 ms
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS LambdaGoogle Cloud Functions
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS LambdaGoogle Cloud Functions
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS Lambda
    AWS Lambda is much easier to use than the near alternatives. It is so straightforward and lightweight it is my primary service for handling small transactions or triggers. The other services require more setup time and are more complex to use. AWS Lambda takes your code snippet …
    Incentivized
    Google
    Chose Google Cloud Functions
    It is easier to keep everything in house when we are using GCP or AWS. To mix Lambda with google cloud is not a best practice and will cause problems ahead. The segmentation is clear, if you are using google, you use Google Cloud Functions. if you are on Amazon, you use all AWS …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    24 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AWS LambdaGoogle Cloud Functions
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions
    Feature
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Google Cloud Functions
    7.5
    2 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.57 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)9.03 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions
    Feature
    AWS Lambda
    4.9
    6 Ratings
    29% below category average
    Google Cloud Functions
    7.5
    2 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Dashboards5.46 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Standard reports5.05 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Custom reports4.35 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions
    Feature
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Google Cloud Functions
    7.3
    2 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Programming Language Diversity9.07 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring8.07 Ratings6.42 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration9.07 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration9.27 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AWS LambdaGoogle Cloud Functions
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    AWS Lambda
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    AWS Lambda
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS LambdaGoogle Cloud Functions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.5
    (52 ratings)
    8.8
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    8.3
    (17 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS LambdaGoogle Cloud Functions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Lambda excels at event-driven, short-lived tasks, such as processing files or building simple APIs. However, it's less ideal for long-running, computationally intensive, or applications that rely on carrying the state between jobs. Cold starts and constant load can easily balloon the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Any sort of transaction or complex logic that is going to take longer than 250ms or accesses resources that are protected by permissions, secrets, etc. is a great use case for a GCF. Some sort of "helper function" associated strictly with the UI inside browser would not be a good application of a GCF. It would not be crazy to create/debug some fairly complicated logic inside the browser/IDE and when perfected package it up as a Google Cloud Function. I have done that many times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • No provisioning required - we don't have to pay anything upfront
    • Serverless deployment - it gets executed only when request comes and we pay only for the time the request is getting executed
    • Integrates well with AWS CloudWatch triggers so it is easy to setup scheduled tasks like cron jobs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • integration with oAuth
    • integration with Firebase
    • integration with React Frontend
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Developing test cases for Lambda functions can be difficult. For functions that require some sort of input it can be tough to develop the proper payload and event for a test.
    • For the uninitiated, deploying functions with Infrastructure as Code tools can be a challenging undertaking.
    • Logging the output of a function feels disjointed from running the function in the console. A tighter integration with operational logging would be appreciated, perhaps being able to view function logs from the Lambda console instead of having to navigate over to CloudWatch.
    • Sometimes its difficult to determine the correct permissions needed for Lambda execution from other AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Needing a zip file is problematic (when wanting to automate deployment for example).
    • Requires another solution to execute automatically (ex. cloud scheduler).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    I give it a seven is usability because it's AWS. Their UI's are always clunkier than the competition and their documentation is rather cumbersome. There's SO MUCH to dig through and it's a gamble if you actually end up finding the corresponding info if it will actually help. Like I said before, going to google with a specific problem is likely a better route because AWS is quite ubiquitous and chances are you're not the first to encounter the problem. That being said, using SAM (Serverless application model) and it's SAM Local environment makes running local instances of your Lambdas in dev environments painless and quite fun. Using Nodejs + Lambda + SAM Local + VS Code debugger = AWESOME.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    The console UI is pretty nasty. Managing various authentication/permissions configurations is just a nightmare. On the other hand, once you are over the hump it's not so bad. AWS Lambda is no better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon consistently provides comprehensive and easy-to-parse documentation of all AWS features and services. Most development team members find what they need with a quick internet search of the AWS documentation available online. If you need advanced support, though, you might need to engage an AWS engineer, and that could be an unexpected (or unwelcome) expense.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Documentation is provided and clear for this service. Although GCP support is included in the current contract we didn't get to use it since the process is pretty straightforward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    AWS Lambda is good for short running functions, and ideally in response to events within AWS. Google App Engine is a more robust environment which can have complex code running for long periods of time, and across more than one instance of hardware. Google App Engine allows for both front-end and back-end infrastructure, while AWS Lambda is only for small back-end functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    It is easier to keep everything in house when we are using GCP or AWS. To mix Lambda with google cloud is not a best practice and will cause problems ahead. The segmentation is clear, if you are using google, you use Google Cloud Functions. if you are on Amazon, you use all AWS tools. You can't mix them. The price is set.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive - Only paying for when code is run, unlike virtual machines where you pay always regardless of processing power usage.
    • Positive - Scalability and accommodating larger amounts of demand is much cheaper. Instead of scaling up virtual machines and increasing the prices you pay for that, you are just increasing the number of times your lambda function is run.
    • Negative - Debugging/troubleshooting, and developing for lambda functions take a bit more time to get used to, and migrating code from virtual machines and normal processes to Lambda functions can take a bit of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • For training purposes, it is free
    • Budgeting makes it cap the use
    • monitoring makes it predictable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots