AWS Serverless Application Repository vs. Google App Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS Serverless Application Repository | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | The AWS Serverless Application Repository is a managed repository for serverless applications. It enables teams, organizations, and individual developers to store and share reusable applications, and easily assemble and deploy serverless architectures in powerful new ways. Using the Serverless Application Repository, users don't need to clone, build, package, or publish source code to AWS before deploying it. | N/A |
Google App Engine | Score8.4 out of 10 | N/A | Google App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages. | $0.05 Per Hour Per Instance |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google App Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google App Engine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.3 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.4 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |



