Azure API Management vs. Flowgear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure API Management
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure API Management supports creation of API.
$0.04
per 10,000 calls
Flowgear
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Flowgear’s platform enables organisations to build application, data and API integrations whether they’re in the Cloud or on-premise, all from a single interface. Using Flowgear’s platform, developers and non-technical users can create, edit and manage enterprise-grade integrations for businesses, customers and suppliers. It offers a code free, drag and drop visual designer which includes a library of prebuilt Connectors and templates. The cloud-based platform enables users to create…
$1,499
per month
Pricing
Azure API ManagementFlowgear
Editions & Modules
Consumption
0.042 per 10,000 calls
Lightweight and serverless version of API Management service, billed per execution
Developer
$48.04
per month Non-production use cases and evaluations
Basic
$147.17
per month Entry-level production use cases
Standard
$686.72
per month Medium-volume production use cases
Premium
$2,795.17
per month High-volume or enterprise production use cases
Isolated
TBA
per month Enterprise production use cases requiring high degree of isolation
Base
$1,499
per month per installation
Standard
$2,499
per month per installation
Professional
$3,999
per month per installation
Enterprise
$7,999
per month per installation
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure API ManagementFlowgear
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure API ManagementFlowgear
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Azure API ManagementFlowgear
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure API Management
8.0
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Flowgear
-
Ratings
API access control8.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies5.44 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data8.94 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning8.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments5.23 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging9.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Azure API Management
-
Ratings
Flowgear
8.8
5 Ratings
9% above category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings9.15 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings9.25 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure API ManagementFlowgear
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure API ManagementFlowgear
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure API ManagementFlowgear
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
APIM is useful for the standard scenarios:
1) Securing your back-end APIs - If you have a legacy back-end web service that has a basic authentication scheme, you can add some additional security by placing APIM in front, and requiring subscription keys. Leverage your existing firewall to ensure only your APIM instance can communicate with your back-end API, and you've basically added a layer of protection.
2) Lift and shift - there are always going to be clients that don't want to update their clients to use a newer API; in some cases you can make a newer API look like an older one by implementing some complex policies in APIM. You can also do the opposite, making older APIs look new, such as making an XML back-end accept both JSON and XML.
3) Centralizing your APIs - if you've acquired another company and want to make their API set look as if it's a part of the larger whole, APIM is an easy way to provide a consistent front-end interface for developers.
Read full review
Flowgear
Flowgear has been exceptionally well suited to automate workflows allowing my product to interface with other products without the need for my team to develop these integration points. The ability to run workflows against multiple environments, in a secure manner, has facilitated rapid development of key client requirements and aided my team in delivering a quality solution.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Easy commissioning of APIs.
  • Great policies to control access.
  • Easy mock services for testing.
Read full review
Flowgear
  • various integration nodes to choose from
  • ease of mapping
  • quick drop point updates and installations and automatic updates
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Lack of robustness is a bit of an issue. Several other providers offer more options and capabilities, but then, they are lacking in interface ease.
  • As with anything Azure, pricing is really hard to stay on top of. I always find that you really don’t know what you’re paying for until you get the bill. Having an excellent Azure Administrator can help resolve that.
  • Integrating with app services outside of Azure can be a challenge, or at least much more challenging than just using Azure App Services.
Read full review
Flowgear
  • Easier way of opening support requests
  • On screen pop ups
  • One click videos
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Flowgear
Training material is excellent with in depth videos and material that are readily available and easy to understand. Materials are upgraded when new features are out. First time users do not find it difficult to follow and understand all modules. Tests are easily completed due to this. Overall training was great
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Azure APIM vs Amazon API Gateway:
1) Azure APIM was a complete package that included a developer portal.
2) We are very Microsoft centric - so the Microsoft product suite aligned very well with our business needs.
3) It was faster and easier to stand up Azure APIM for testing than it was for the Amazon API Gateway.
Read full review
Flowgear
From a cost perspective, for what it provides and delivers compared to its rivals, its functionality is right up there. If you're looking to get started with a Saas platform, there really is no better tool than Flowgear.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • We can always think of positive ROI impact on business
  • It helps to easily facilitate the design, deployment, and maintenance of our APIs
Read full review
Flowgear
  • Ease of Integration
  • Shareable Costs
  • Range of Customers
Read full review
ScreenShots

Flowgear Screenshots

Screenshot of Pricing ModelScreenshot of Flowgear Key FeaturesScreenshot of High Cadence Value PropositionsScreenshot of No CodeScreenshot of Design Canvas and Activity LogsScreenshot of Sample workflow - Import Sales and Purchase Order