Azure Automation vs. CA Workload Automation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Automation
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Azure Automation is a solution to automate frequent, time-consuming, and error-prone cloud management tasks, and ensures consistent management for Windows and Linux. Users can write runbooks graphically in PowerShell or Python to integrate Azure services and other public systems required for deploying, configuring, and managing end-to-end processes. It can also be used to orchestrate across on-premises environments using a hybrid runbook worker to deliver on-demand services. Automations from…N/A
CA Workload Automation
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
As the name may suggest, CA Workload Automation is CA Technologies workload automation offering.N/A
Pricing
Azure AutomationCA Workload Automation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure AutomationCA Workload Automation
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure AutomationCA Workload Automation
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Azure AutomationCA Workload Automation
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Automation
7.2
1 Ratings
14% below category average
CA Workload Automation
9.4
4 Ratings
13% above category average
Multi-platform scheduling5.01 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Central monitoring8.01 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Logging8.01 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Alerts and notifications8.01 Ratings9.74 Ratings
Analysis and visualization8.01 Ratings8.84 Ratings
Application integration6.01 Ratings8.94 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure AutomationCA Workload Automation
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.3 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure AutomationCA Workload Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure AutomationCA Workload Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
We have found Azure Automation to be well-suited for tasks that must be performed on a scheduled basis. No matter how simple or tedious tasks are to perform manually, if they run on a scheduled basis, it makes sense to have them automated. If the tasks at hand are only performed once or infrequently, then it may be best to continue performing them manually.
Read full review
Broadcom
CA Workload Automation is well suited for firms having to manage and monitor multiple applications operating in multiple environments. and having SLA requirements. CA Workload Automation is less appropriate and not cost-effective for non-critical applications and/or jobs. CA Workload Automation is ideal for companies that require reliable and stable Production support for their business critical jobs to finish on time.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Scheduled automation of Microsoft 365 and Azure tasks
  • Scheduled automation of scripting (e.g. Powershell)
  • Perform periodic maintenance
Read full review
Broadcom
  • All batch jobs can be monitored from one dashboard.
  • Provides detailed error logs.
  • We have developed packages to invoke OIC integrations through Autosys.
  • Notifications is a good feature when job fails or runs beyond cutoff time.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • An automation template library would be nice
  • Clear estimation of costs - this goes for the entire Azure Automation platform
  • It can be daunting at first due to all the settings and menu levels, but it is not difficult once you get started.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Monitoring of front-end websites.
  • More utilization insights if possible.
  • Customer service via chat in the future if possible.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
Very happy!
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
It would be great if customer chat experience is also readily available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We did not evaluate any other automation products since we are already using Microsoft 365 and the Azure platform. Additionally, Azure Automation allows for a reasonable number of tasks to be performed each month at no cost, which is especially nice when testing the platform. We found Azure Automate's integration of Powershell invaluable when working directly with Microsoft 365, Sharepoint, Azure AD, and other systems via API.
Read full review
Broadcom
We selected CA Workload Automation for the ease of integration and less time to setup. It has less overhead to manage the application and is a very robust application.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Ensures tasks are not forgotten
  • Saves times - routine tasks no longer have to be performed manually
  • Complicated tasks are no longer an issue
Read full review
Broadcom
  • CA Workload Automation has improved SLA by 50%.
  • CA Workload Automation has reduced job failures by 60%.
  • CA Workload Automation has improved staff productivity and problem resolution.
  • CA Workload Automation has improved application availability.
Read full review
ScreenShots