Azure Batch vs. CA Workload Automation

To better serve their consumers, businesses that often interact with those clients who rely on Microsoft's software products may consider migrating to Azure. This program would be useful in any installation of a Microsoft product or suite that necessitates a test of the target environment. It is simple to maintain and implement, making it an ideal IT backbone. If a client doesn't have any use for this particular instrument, it's not going to be of any benefit to them.

Incentivized

CA Workload Automation is well suited for firms having to manage and monitor multiple applications operating in multiple environments. and having SLA requirements. CA Workload Automation is less appropriate and not cost-effective for non-critical applications and/or jobs. CA Workload Automation is ideal for companies that require reliable and stable Production support for their business critical jobs to finish on time.

Incentivized

• Ease of scripting
• Scheduling
• Combination of Data Sets

Incentivized

• All batch jobs can be monitored from one dashboard.
• Provides detailed error logs.
• We have developed packages to invoke OIC integrations through Autosys.
• Notifications is a good feature when job fails or runs beyond cutoff time.

Incentivized

• The UI could be a little more clearer in my opinion.
• Password resets would be nice to have in any instance (not just the default area).
• Easier to migrate repeated account that may have been created.

Incentivized

• Monitoring of front-end websites.
• More utilization insights if possible.
• Customer service via chat in the future if possible.

Incentivized

Very happy!

Incentivized

It would be great if customer chat experience is also readily available.

Incentivized

Both are excellent resources that successfully deliver the promised benefits. Two rival businesses, each with its own distinct culture and set of goals. As far as IT assistance goes, I find Azure's user interface to be slightly more intuitive. Both resources are valuable and have their advantages and disadvantages. Both are crucial if you run a fast-paced business with a large consumer base.

Incentivized

We selected CA Workload Automation for the ease of integration and less time to setup. It has less overhead to manage the application and is a very robust application.

Incentivized

• After setting things up we have reduced time in running all of the processing
• It is promising in allowing us to concentrate on the data rather than the formatting and presentation that can all be automated after it has been processed
• We have reduced the number of products we used before adopting Batch

Incentivized

• CA Workload Automation has improved SLA by 50%.
• CA Workload Automation has reduced job failures by 60%.
• CA Workload Automation has improved staff productivity and problem resolution.
• CA Workload Automation has improved application availability.

Incentivized