Azure Data Factory vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Data Factory
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Data Factory is a service built for all data integration needs and skill levels. It is designed to allow the user to easily construct ETL and ELT processes code-free within the intuitive visual environment, or write one's own code. Visually integrate data sources using more than 80 natively built and maintenance-free connectors at no added cost. Focus on data—the serverless integration service does the rest.N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Considered Both Products
Azure Data Factory
Chose Azure Data Factory
The easy integration with other Microsoft software as well as high processing speed, very flexible cost, and high level of security of Microsoft Azure products and services stack up against other similar products.
IBM InfoSphere Information Server

No answer on this topic

Features
Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
8.5
10 Ratings
3% above category average
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.7
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources9.010 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL8.010 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
7.8
10 Ratings
3% below category average
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.6
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Simple transformations8.710 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Complex transformations7.010 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
6.3
10 Ratings
21% below category average
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.0
4 Ratings
3% above category average
Data model creation4.57 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Metadata management5.58 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Business rules and workflow6.010 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Collaboration7.09 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Testing and debugging6.310 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Factory
5.7
10 Ratings
33% below category average
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Integration with data quality tools4.310 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools7.09 Ratings9.53 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
dbt
dbt
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(7 ratings)
8.9
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Data FactoryIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Best scenario is for ETL process. The flexibility and connectivity is outstanding. For our environment, SAP data connectivity with Azure Data Factory offers very limited features compared to SAP Data Sphere. Due to the limited modelling capacity of the tool, we use Databricks for data modelling and cleaning. Usage of multiple tools could have been avoided if adf has modelling capabilities.
Read full review
IBM
Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Data Ingestion - it works very well with numerous data sources.
  • Data pipeline orchestration: It is a generic, popular tool for orchestrating data pipelines.
  • Works well in Azure ecosystem, Azure services and data platforms like Databricks.
  • It is a serverless and scalable solution for cloud data integration.
Read full review
IBM
  • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
  • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
  • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Granularity of Errors: Sometimes, Azure Data Factory provides error messages that are too generic or vague for us, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact cause of a pipeline failure. Enhanced error messages with more actionable details would greatly assist us as users in debugging their pipelines.
  • Pipeline Design UI: In my experience, the visual interface for designing pipelines, especially when dealing with complex workflows or numerous activities, can become cluttered. I think a more intuitive and scalable design interface would improve usability. In my opinion, features like zoom, better alignment tools, or grouping capabilities could make managing intricate designs more manageable.
  • Native Support: While Azure Data Factory does support incremental data loads, in my experience, the setup can be somewhat manual and complex. I think native and more straightforward support for Change Data Capture, especially from popular databases, would simplify the process of capturing and processing only the changed data, making regular data updates more efficient
Read full review
IBM
  • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
  • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
  • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Scale of implementation
  • IBM techsupport
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
So far product has performed as expected. We were noticing some performance issues, but they were largely Synapse related. This has led to a shift from Synapse to Databricks. Overall this has delayed our analytic platform. Once databricks becomes fully operational, Azure Data Factory will be critical to our environment and future success.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
We have not had need to engage with Microsoft much on Azure Data Factory, but they have been responsive and helpful when needed. This being said, we have not had a major emergency or outage requiring their intervention. The score of seven is a representation that they have done well for now, but have not proved out their support for a significant issue
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Azure Data Factory helps us automate to schedule jobs as per customer demands to make ETL triggers when the need arises. Anyone can define the workflow with the Azure Data Factory UI designer tool and easily test the systems. It helped us automate the same workflow with programming languages like Python or automation tools like ansible. Numerous options for connectivity be it a database or storage account helps us move data transfer to the cloud or on-premise systems.
Read full review
IBM
DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Facilitate better decision-making and improve business processes.
  • Optimize business process outcomes by increasing internal efficiency and operational effectiveness.
  • Boosts revenue growth while improving business process agility.
Read full review
IBM
  • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
  • Better documentation and governance.
  • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
Read full review
ScreenShots