Azure DevOps Server vs. Liquibase vs. Redgate Flyway

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
Liquibase
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Liquibase is a database change management tool that extends DevOps best practices to the database, helping teams release software faster and safer by bringing the database change process into existing CI/CD automation. According to the 2021 Accelerate State of DevOps Report, elite performers are 3.4 times more likely to incorporate database change management into their process than low performers. Liquibase value proposition: Liquibase speeds up the development…N/A
Redgate Flyway
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Redgate Flyway extends DevOps practices to databases to speed up software delivery while keeping business-critical data safe. From version control to continuous delivery, Redgate Flyway helps enterprises build on application delivery processes to automate database development and deployments.
$0
Pricing
Azure DevOps ServerLiquibaseRedgate Flyway
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Community
Free
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOps ServerLiquibaseRedgate Flyway
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOps ServerLiquibaseRedgate Flyway
Considered Multiple Products
Azure DevOps Server

No answer on this topic

Liquibase
Chose Liquibase
In my previous project and organization I have used Flyway for database change management and version control similar to Liquibase which I am currently using. Comparing it with Flyway, Liquibase provides more feature flexibility and enhancements to handle complex workflows with …
Chose Liquibase
The functionalities in general were very similar, but Liquibase was less intrusive and had a larger community, which made incident resolution more agile without depending on the support of the platform itself.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase met our needs in a better way, even with the free version alone, then we decided to upgrade our license in order to be able to access policy checks baseline feature
Chose Liquibase
We looked at Flyway yet if seemed to be not as comprehensive at Liquibase.
Chose Liquibase
flyway use sql for defining change but Liquidbase provides flexibility to specify change in different formats including sql such as xml, yaml and json
Chose Liquibase
With Flyway you need to Write rollback scripts manually. With Liquibase we have a lot of customization with to rollback with options such rollback-one-changeset or rollback-one-update.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase provide rollback feature more matured than others.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase makes it easy to integrate into CI/CD pipelines, keeping the database and code in sync. The switch from one database management system to another is made easier by modeling the structure of the database in DBMS-independent XML rather than SQL. A user-friendly web …
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase is much more powerful compared to Flyway since it is much more flexible in nature. You can apply changes programmatically, works with any kind of database and provides features version controlling database schemas. All these features were missing in Flyway and that's …
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase is preferred over Flyway if your engineers doesn’t have knowledge in the DDL language used in each database product supported. If you only need to support a single database product and your engineers have the skills I would recommend Flyway instead. Liquibase is …
Chose Liquibase
Both liquibase and Flyway help you deploy database changes associated with new application deployments. They will both help with reducing database administration tasks and ensure reliability of the application service. Comparing Liquibase and Flyway, I found liquibase to be …
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase is head and shoulders better than relying on SQL Compare alone for deployments. I haven't used Flyway, but based on our evaluation, Liquibase seemed to have a lot of functional overlap for considerably less cost. I would recommend the use of GitHub or Bitbucket in …
Chose Liquibase
At the time, Liquibase offered a community version and I think Flyway didn’t. In our case, we did not have any previous experience with any database management tools, so we just went with what was free to try out.
Chose Liquibase
More configurable and more flexible. Might include solutions for NoSql in the future. A couple of useful plugins (hibernate integration, for example).
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase has better options than Flyway software. Liquibase seems to have everything Flyway has and more flexibility when it comes to rollbacks. The main advantage of just Flyway seems to be not having to use XML, but Liquibase allows you to specify an SQL file in their XML. …
Chose Liquibase
The main reason for Liquibase and against Flyway is the independence of the RDBMS product used.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase has a more robust feature set including schema definitions in XML, JSON, and YAML. Liquibase Hub provides a better view of deployment status.
Redgate Flyway

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Azure DevOps ServerLiquibaseRedgate Flyway
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.3 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DevOps ServerLiquibaseRedgate Flyway
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(48 ratings)
9.0
(70 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(4 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(10 ratings)
9.8
(68 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOps ServerLiquibaseRedgate Flyway
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
Read full review
Liquibase
Based on my experience so far on using Liquibase in my current project, I have seen that Liquibase changelogs are version control where multiple team members and developers can work together on database and deployed automatically via CI/CD Pipeline integration using github actions and it applies same changelogs to all enviroments to remain in sync and avoid any enviroment drift. Also as Liquibase stores changelog audits in DATABASECHANGELOG table it helps in tracking purposes and to easily rollback any change . Whereas in some scenarios I feel that Liquibase have some drawbacks where if complex transformation between tables is not optimized for bulk data operations which eventually degrades database performance.
Read full review
Redgate
Database Migrations on Java-based solutions. It has one of the best integrations with it as a database migration tool, you can do it with the community edition (no pricing involved) and it works flawlessly with Maven and Gradle. It's not an expensive tool in order to use the next level of features and is worth the money. I would recommend reaching that edition level as the object mapping feature gets really handy. I would not recommend it for any Microsoft-based solution (.Net) as is not compatible at all based on my experience, this is a tool only worth it with Java applications.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
  • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
  • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
Read full review
Liquibase
  • Liquibase tracks changes in a metadata table contained directly in the target database, making easy administration for the DBA.
  • Liquibase handles many validation tests out of the box, making it easy to choose which ones you want to include, with options for writing your own if you choose. This makes it robust and flexible in terms of validation before deployment.
  • Liquibase provides easy integration into deployment pipelines for CI/CD. We use it with GitHub for source control and Circle CI for validation and deployment pipelines.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Manage DB migration patch scripts
  • Apply DB migration patch scripts
  • Test DB migration patch scripts
  • Setup new DB instances, including on local env
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
  • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
  • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
Read full review
Liquibase
  • I would like Liquibase to explore all errors in the changelog files compared to one at a time. We spent a lot of time troubleshooting one error at a time versus having a batch log of errors in each file.
  • Understanding where to get support on things. I spent a lot of time researching externally to learn what the best practices were. Although I found some of the youtube videos helpful, I would like a little more of a technical support. This may be a feature with the paid tier, however, we leveraged open source.
  • Seeing more examples of how others use Liquibase and their usecases will be helpful. That way we can learn from each other which may help us improve on our own deployments.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Updating it causes problems, there have been unnecessary changes that wasted time
  • Requires knowledge & studying so it's used properly
  • Lots of options that might be difficult to understand for non technical people
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
Liquibase
We are and will continue using Liquibase and it has become an integral part of our portfolio offering, any new product is by default adopting Liquibase stack.
Read full review
Redgate
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
Liquibase
Liquibase has several features, on their free plan, that matches exactly our expectations and needs: this already makes it standout from its competitors. On top of that, the setup was straightforward: we are running an integration with Databricks, and there were only two steps truly needed, install the driver and the plugin, done. This is the type of seamless experience our team appreciates the most when evaluating a tool or service.
Read full review
Redgate
It's very easy to install and use. Even someone very new to the software will have no trouble, plus the team reach out to help you and continue to offer you support throughout. Really simple interface, clean design, all you could really ask for in a tool that needs to do a job dependably
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
Liquibase
Liquibase has been responsive and even is letting our group test some new products they are developing and even made code changes to their production system because of a couple bugs we have reported. Liquibase licensing has also been easy and simple. I have nothing bad to say about any of the Liquibase staff I have talked to. They also hold free information webinars for new content that helps spread adoption and moving the product forward.
Read full review
Redgate
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
Liquibase
Build process takes a toll.
Read full review
Redgate
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
Read full review
Liquibase
There is no real competitor when it comes to what Liquibase does - at least not at the time we considered it three years ago. It was an easy choice in this regard, but we could have said no to it if it made our workload more difficult. But our proof of concept showed there were easy wins to be had by implementing its software.
Read full review
Redgate
The problem with a cloud-based tool for migration services is the cloud dependency. You are restricted to use the tool along the Cloud provider. Flyway gives you the freedom to use it in any scenario as long as you are working with a compatible database engine. Even if you are working on-premise and you don't have plans to move to a cloud architecture. Or even for sandbox development scenarios where you are a developer playing around with some project ideas. And you don't have to pay anything as long as you need advanced features, and not less importantly, you are using an open-source tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
Liquibase
  • We need to re-educate developers to use Liquibase.
  • In some cases, it is hard to align when several teams work on the same DB.
  • On the other hand, Liquibase provides order and consistency in managing DB changes.
  • Evidence and traceability are a plus.
Read full review
Redgate
  • I definitely think it do have positive impact to our company's database management.
  • We have 4 database environments and thus it is easy when we push the database to various environments.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Redgate Flyway Screenshots

Screenshot of Flyway Enterprise – auto-generation of migration scriptsScreenshot of Flyway Enterprise - reportingScreenshot of Flyway Enterprise - drift detection