Azure DevOps Server vs. Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Score 10.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Matrix Requirements helps medical device companies to manage their design and quality system, offering products that manage medical device requirements, specifications, risks and tests ensuring full traceability and ensuring compliance regulations for quality systems. MatrixALM can be used to manage all design inputs and outputs in one place and makes it visible for the whole team at any time supporting any workflow: Waterfall, V-Model or Agile.
$500
per month per user
Pricing
Azure DevOps ServerMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Matrix Essential
$500
per month per seat
Matrix Team
$750
per month per seat
Matrix Company
$1,145
per month per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOps ServerMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWe also have an enterprise offering. Speak to our team to learn more!
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOps ServerMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Best Alternatives
Azure DevOps ServerMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.0 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DevOps ServerMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(48 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOps ServerMatrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
  • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
  • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
  • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
  • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
Matrix Requirements
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots