Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. Syself

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.N/A
Syself
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Syself offers a simplified Kubernetes Management Platform, used to build reliable environments with 100% reproducibility in just a few steps, no need for in-house experts. With its roots in open-source, Syself states they maintain projects used by hundreds of organizations, running thousands of servers daily on cloud infrastructure. The Syself Kubernetes Platform manages the entire lifecycle of clusters, from creation to scaling and upgrades. Key features: • Ease of use:…
$299
per month
Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Syself
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Syself
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Syself
Features
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Syself
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
7.1
3 Ratings
13% below category average
Syself
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management6.23 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management6.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks4.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Syself
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Syself
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Syself
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
AKS works very well for running containerized applications that require high availability and scalability. This includes systems like our HRIS platform and customer-facing web applications. AKS is a good choice when applications are broken into multiple services that need independent scaling and deployment. It provides the flexibility needed to manage these architectures effectively. But for single, low-traffic applications or simple internal tools, AKS can be overkill. For scenarios like that Azure App Service would be better.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • AKS makes it easier to replicate data to multiple regions
  • Azure portal make it easier to manage the resources of the organization
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • Steep learning curve
  • Expected charges are unclear until you see real production usage
  • Operations teams need to learn an entirely new skill set
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
It is not as straight forward and user friendly as in AWS or GCP. It needs a lot of monitoring and checking if any failed services have been deallocated or not. It feels like the managed service only actually manages the UI and not much beyond it. I works so you can't complain but it can be tonnes better.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Due to cost efficiency. And using AZURE cloud for other services as well. Azure Kubernetes Service is more suitable to configure CI/CD pipelines. With a facility of automated or One click deployment and integration of the application. As compared with other Kubernetes Services like Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service and Google Kubernetes Service, Azure Kubernetes is most cost-efficient with the same facilities and with an advantage to configure easily, manage easily, as it is one click manageable with Microsoft applications. It provides high Microsoft security to containers and secures applications from any kind of harm.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • The ability to scale has reduced the need for headcount in IT
  • The authentication process has kept us compliant with regulatory bodies
  • The ability to replicate environments is great.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots