Azure Load Testing vs. Icinga

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Load Testing
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Load Testing is a fully managed load-testing service built for Azure that makes it easier to generate high-scale load and identify app performance bottlenecks. The service enables developers and testers to generate high-scale load and run simulations that reveal actionable insights into app performance, scalability, and capacity with a fully managed load-testing service. Create tests quickly without prior knowledge of load testing tools, or upload existing Apache JMeter scripts. Users can…
$10
per month
Icinga
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Azure Load TestingIcinga
Editions & Modules
Virtual User Hour (VUH) additional usage - 9,950+ Virtual User Hours
$0.075
additional VUH
Virtual User Hour (VUH) additional usage - 0 - 9,950 Virtual User Hours
$0.15
per additional VUH
Load Testing Resource
$10
per month includes 50 Virtual User Hours (VUH) per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Load TestingIcinga
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Load TestingIcinga
Best Alternatives
Azure Load TestingIcinga
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Load TestingIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Load TestingIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a world-class monitoring system. It can be used for most general monitoring situations. It is not a silver bullet, however, and there are instances where domain-specific monitoring systems are necessary. However, the output from those monitoring systems can be funneled into Icinga as a central monitoring and alerting system.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
  • Wealth of community-developed plugins.
  • Stable codebase.
  • Icinga 2 supports distributed monitoring.
  • Very performant, can support tens of thousands of checks per server.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
  • High learning curve, setting up Icinga from scratch can be a bit of a challenge starting out.
  • If the io2db process fails you UI stops updating, which can be very frustrating.
  • There is no simple mechanism for adding new hosts and services through the web UI, it's all very config-file based.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is better than Nagios because of its nicer user interface. New Relic can monitor CPU/memory and disk usage, but it's more of a performance and application troubleshooting tool rather than monitoring
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
ScreenShots