TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Machine Learning vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Machine Learning

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Machine Learning is and end-to-end data science and analytics solution that helps professional data scientists to prepare data, develop experiments, and deploy models in the cloud. It replaces the Azure Machine Learning Workbench.

    $0

    per month

    IBM Watson Studio

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Studio
    Editions & Modules
    Studio Pricing - Free
    $0.00
    per month
    Production Web API - Dev/Test
    $0.00
    per month
    Studio Pricing - Standard
    $9.99
    per ML studio workspace/per month
    Production Web API - Standard S1
    $100.13
    per month
    Production Web API - Standard S2
    $1000.06
    per month
    Production Web API - Standard S3
    $9999.98
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Studio
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Studio
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure Machine Learning
    The Azure Machine Learning Studio eliminates the complex tasks of data engineering and python coding for the data scientists to build models a simpler way. While SageMaker provide[s] a similar environment, [it] requires higher knowledge of data engineering. Even same for the …
    Incentivized
    IBM
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    Watson Studio offers more capabilities and diversity in tools and services.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    DSX is a good challenger for Databricks and co. It is Enterprise ready and well integrated.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    I wanted an environment that can support multiple users without any restrictions. Also, R-Studio does not provide a collaborative environment for multiple users. The Auto feature selection in the SPSS modeler is a good node in DSx which helps make statistical decisions on …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    Although we also use Azure ML services we prefer DSX because of SPSS integration.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Studio
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Azure Machine Learning and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    Azure Machine Learning
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    8.1
    22 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    MDM Integration00 Ratings6.414 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Azure Machine Learning and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    Azure Machine Learning
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    10.0
    22 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Visualization00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Azure Machine Learning and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    Azure Machine Learning
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Data Transformations00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Data Encryption00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Built-in Processors00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Azure Machine Learning and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    Azure Machine Learning
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Azure Machine Learning and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    Azure Machine Learning
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    8.0
    22 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings7.022 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Studio
    Small Businesses
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Posit
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.0
    (65 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.6
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    I would highly recommend Azure machine learning design for those with less access to high-end computing infrastructure, as using Azure saves a lot of time, money, and effort by providing a hustle-free platform that is easy to use and train your employees on. On the other hand, if you are looking for complete control of the machine learning model you create and would like to add detailed functionalities and try different algorithms, then Azure is less suitable here as it’s very high level.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Easy to create the experiment.
    • Easy to adopt the best algorithm.
    • Efficient way to deploy the model as a web service.
    • Centralized platform for the life cycle of machine learning goal.
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
    • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
    • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
    • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Few models: Even though it has a lot of Machine Learning models, it is quite limited when compared to R. Most Data Scientists still use and prefer R, so the newest models tend to release as R libraries. With Azure ML, we need to wait for Microsoft to evaluate and decide if including a new model is a good idea or not
    • Tableau interface: last time I checked there was no easy way to connect with Tableau.
    • Cloud based: You always need a good internet connection to use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
    • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
    • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Good UX/UI and overall good usability, but it takes a while to get used to the product & platform. The whole design seems fragmented with little in terms of integration with project management tools such as JIRA, or wireframing. Overall it feels like an unfinished product that's meant for teaching more than for production.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Never had slow response even on our very busy network
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    I'm satisfied with the Azure Machine Learning Studio- it fulfilled my goal in a single channel. Even haven't worr[ied] about the maintenance or any fault tolerance. This provide[s] the user interactive UI to grab the features easily. [Their] support teams also very help[ful], they stand with us at any time.
    Read full review
    IBM
    I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Not sure
    Read full review
    IBM
    It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    It is easier to learn, it has a very cost effective license for use, it has native build and created for Azure cloud services, and that makes it perfect when compared against the alternatives. As a Microsoft tool, it has been built to contain many visual features and improved usability even for non-specialist users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Reduce energy consumption caused by GPUs.
    • Saves on recycling and transporting costs and maintenance caused by buying high-end equipment.
    • Improve productivity as building products using Azure is easier than building everything up from scratch (e.g., machine learning and AI applications).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
    • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
    • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots