Azure NetApp Files vs. Public Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure NetApp Files
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers.
$21,474,836.48
per month
Public Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Azure NetApp FilesPublic Cloud
Editions & Modules
Restore
$0.02/GiB
per month
Backup
$0.05/GiB
per month
Cross Region Replication Daily - Replication frequency is once a day
$0.11/GiB
per month
Cross Region Replication Hourly - Replication frequency is every 1 hour
$0.12/GiB
per month
Cross Region Replication Minutes - Replication frequency is every 10 mins
$0.14/GiB
per month
Standard Storage
$0.14746 per GiB
per month
Premium Storage
$0.29419 per GiB
per month
Ultra Storage
$0.39274 per GiB
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure NetApp FilesPublic Cloud
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAzure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure NetApp FilesPublic Cloud
Features
Azure NetApp FilesPublic Cloud
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Azure NetApp Files
7.7
8 Ratings
6% below category average
Public Cloud
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling7.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools7.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls7.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure NetApp Files
-
Ratings
Public Cloud
8.6
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Cloud Management Security00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Cost Management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Governance and Compliance00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Systems Integration00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure NetApp FilesPublic Cloud
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure NetApp FilesPublic Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(8 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure NetApp FilesPublic Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
NetApp
In my opinion, I would say it is more suitable to huge workloads, where you really needs the reliability and performance that a Netapp storage provides to you, larger share sizes, etc. Use cases where you really needs to store large amounts of non-structured data. It is not a cheap solution, I mean, you can find other options to store your data on the Cloud at smaller prices. So, for small companies, or companies that depends mostly on web-applications, or don't have such a specific requirements, I would not go with Azure Netapp Files.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
Best suited for environments where there are standard processes and no scope for customization and not suitable for industries where the business processes are dynamic and prone to changes frequently. Also, where the users are already experienced or users of SAP would help to easily help to adopt the cloud approach.
Read full review
Pros
NetApp
  • We have found that it scales very well. In some cases we had a large existing storage infrastructure and were able to migrate it while other times we started from scratch with low storage demands and Azure NetApp Files fit the bill each time.
  • We have been impressed with the replication capabailities.
  • The read and write speed when interacting with files is a major asset.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
  • Scalability
  • Cost Savings
  • Increased Flexibility
  • Improved Safety
  • Ease of Data migration with the help of migration cockpit
Read full review
Cons
NetApp
  • It does not support file locking although its available as an add-on
  • Design is far from native and has a learning curve
  • We would like to have backup functionality built in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
  • Additional processes
  • Better UI
  • Access
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
NetApp
Azure NetApp Files is very well integrated with Microsoft Azure, we use the same request methods that everyone knows from Azure. NetApp and Microsoft has built a very efficient solution that allows you to transfer virtually any service to the Microsoft public cloud. Azure NetApp Files also protects our data very well.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
Read full review
Return on Investment
NetApp
  • The main hurdle in promoting this solution is the price. Its price definitely requires an improvement. It is more expensive than other options, so customers go for a cheaper option.
  • Its security and ease of use are most valuable.
  • It is stable and scalable.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
  • Less infrastructure
  • Quick and easy
  • Post-go-live maintenance
Read full review
ScreenShots