TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Pipelines

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AUsers can automate builds and deployments with Azure Pipelines. Build, test, and deploy Node.js, Python, Java, PHP, Ruby, C/C++, .NET, Android, and iOS apps. Run in parallel on Linux, macOS, and Windows. Azure Pipelines can be purchased standalone, but it is also part of Azure DevOps Services agile development planning and CI/CD suite.N/A

    HashiCorp Packer

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AHashiCorp Packer automates the creation of machine images, coming out of the box with support to build images for Amazon EC2, CloudStack, DigitalOcean, Docker, Google Compute Engine, Microsoft Azure, QEMU, VirtualBox, and VMware.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure PipelinesHashiCorp Packer
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure PipelinesHashiCorp Packer
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Azure PipelinesHashiCorp Packer
    Small Businesses
    Apache Maven
    Score9 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Maven
    Score9 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure PipelinesHashiCorp Packer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure PipelinesHashiCorp Packer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It is good tool if you are doing continuous improvements in your code and you wish it goes live whenever you push code to GitHub. So integrating Azure Pipeline, it automatically does CI/CD in the background once you push code/merge code and it is live in few minutes. It also does some automated tests if you have wrote scripts
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    We use packer to generate new machine images for multiple platforms on every change to our Configuration Management tools like Chef/Puppet/Ansible It's act single tool for Image building for Multi-provider like AWS/Azure/GCP Helps to achieve Dev/Prod Parity Packer itself doesn't have a state like Terraform. You can't do packer output AMI ID. If you have a scenario where you want to maintain the state for images it would be tough to manage via Packer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Integration with SonarQube
    • Integration with Azure DevOps
    • Integration with GitHub
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Multi-provider portability
    • Greater testability
    • Super fast infrastructure deployment
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • The errors which we got sometimes are not clearly enough.
    • There are some let's say hidden options, they could be more visible
    • When the process is running we have to remember about manually refreshing to see the current status because it doesn't work automatically
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Manageability
    • Manageability
    • Manageability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    We are happy with the use of Packer in our organization. Apart from manageability, I don't find any other drawback with Packer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It's best for building Image with many features and benefits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I only once required support and it was very smooth.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I haven't found any issue in Implementation that itself describes how well this tool is built.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    We have used the GitHub CI/CD. Earlier we were using the Azure Pipelines but after GitHub had their actions, we integrated that for CI/CD. It runs the tests and makes a production build which can be live. GitHub CI/CD is more useful because we have to make script only once then just by few changes we can deploy it onto Azure, AWS, Google anywhere so we found it more convenient
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    There are lot of tools in market which does the job for Image creation but all of them are not complete Machine/Image as a code. All other alternatives can create Image partially. Main reason for selecting Packer are Packer is lightweight, portable, and command-line driven Packer helps keep development, staging, and production as similar as possible. Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image Multi-provider portability is the feature to die for
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • we have had outages from Azure in the past
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Super fast infrastructure deployment
    • Quick turnaround of infrastructure in multiple cloud using single tool.
    • Increase productivity by reducing time in infrastructure building.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots