Azure Test Plans vs. PractiTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Test Plans
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Azure Test Plans is an exploratory test toolkit available from Microsoft's Azure suite of services. It enables manual testing for users, so that they can plan, execute, and track scripted tests with actionable defects and end-to-end traceability. Assess quality throughout the development lifecycle by testing your desktop or web applications. It is available with Azure DevOps Services.N/A
PractiTest
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
Pricing
Azure Test PlansPractiTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Test PlansPractiTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Test PlansPractiTest
Features
Azure Test PlansPractiTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Test Plans
8.4
6 Ratings
4% above category average
PractiTest
8.5
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Centralized test management8.86 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.56 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Test execution reporting9.36 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Defect management7.46 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Test PlansPractiTest
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Test PlansPractiTest
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(6 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Test PlansPractiTest
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It works well for express test case implementation with a short duration. You can define the tests for two weeks and run the activities documenting the software errors and fixes to control the effectiveness of DevOps. The graphic reports give the idea of the backlog phases advances and errors detected. It needs improvement if you have a large test project and need to design financial budgets and control over costs of the test plan.
Read full review
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Multi test plan access
  • Well structured and easy to use
  • Integrates with other azure features to work seamlessly ,connecting the data flow
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Graphic definition of the the Work Break Down Structure
  • Gantt Chart to check the activity dependance and flow of the process
  • Basic cost module to design test budgets.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We're doing a full continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), continuous testing (CT), security, delivery, and monitoring. They have been lately adding features to the services on a regular basis. Every two weeks, they add functionality to Azure DevOps Services to match it with what Azure DevOps Server or on-prem would offer. So, we continue to get more robust functionality. My favorite right now is that they are starting to open up the API availability within Azure DevOps Services.
Read full review
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Pros: One stop solution for end to end traceability
  • Pros: Exploratory testing used
  • Pros: maximum coverage on multiple browsers, operating system combinations
  • Cons: Integration with Non-Microsoft tools can be improved
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
ScreenShots

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of