Azure VMware Solution vs. ShareGate

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure VMware Solution
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Azure VMware Solution enables users to run VMware workloads natively on Azure. The user can move VMware-based workloads from the datacenter to Azure and integrate a VMware environment with Azure. This enables users to continue managing existing environments with the same VMware tools already in use while including Azure native services. Azure VMware Solution is a Microsoft service, verified by VMware, that runs on Azure infrastructure.
$10.41
per hour
ShareGate
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
ShareGate is an Microsoft 365 migration and governance platform that focuses on simplicity, boasting over 100,000 IT pros as users.
$5,995
per year
Pricing
Azure VMware SolutionShareGate
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
ShareGate Protect
$1995
per year
Migrate Essentials
$5,995
per year 1 machine activation for essential migrations
Migrate Pro
$9,995
per year 5 machine activation for essential migrations
Migrate Enterprise
$17,995
per year 25 machine activation for essential migrations
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure VMware SolutionShareGate
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure VMware SolutionShareGate
Features
Azure VMware SolutionShareGate
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Azure VMware Solution
9.1
5 Ratings
10% above category average
ShareGate
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls9.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure VMware SolutionShareGate
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.7 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Cloud for VMware Solutions
IBM Cloud for VMware Solutions
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure VMware SolutionShareGate
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(5 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(4 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure VMware SolutionShareGate
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Cloud-Native Applications: If you are building cloud-native applications that are designed to run on Azure, AVS may not be the best solution. In this case, you should consider using Azure-native services, such as Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) or Azure Functions.Minimal Workloads: If you have a small number of workloads, it may not be cost-effective to use AVS. In this case, you can consider using Azure Virtual Machines (VMs) or other Azure services that are better suited for small workloads.Custom Hardware Configurations: If you require custom hardware configurations or specialized hardware, AVS may not be able to meet your requirements. In this case, you can consider using other Azure services, such as Azure Dedicated Hosts, that offer more flexibility in terms of hardware configurations.Cost-Sensitive Workloads: If you have cost-sensitive workloads, AVS may not be the best solution. While AVS offers many benefits, it can also be more expensive than other Azure services. In this case, you should consider using Azure services that are more cost-effective, such as Azure Virtual Machines.
Read full review
Workleap
ShareGate is well suited for SharePoint on-prem to on prem site migrations, on-prem site to online SharePoint migrations, file share migrations to SharePoint online. Moving power and automating workflows using the ShareGate tool is less appropriate.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Provide hardware and infrastructure for hosting VMs
  • Ability to backup and restore between On Premise and cloud
  • Make it easy to implement a DR solution
Read full review
Workleap
  • Migrating Sites and data on harddrives to SharePoint
  • Copying all kinds of SharePoint objects between sites
  • Reports on Orphaned users and other audit requirements
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • More regions to deploy
  • More clarity on billing
  • Reduce latency
Read full review
Workleap
  • Auditing -connect with MS purview
  • Better reports export for permissions matrix
  • Better user mapping (poll source and destination sites and try to auto map)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Workleap
It is a powerful tool for copying files along with their associated metadata and version history. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and supports workflow migrations. However, it may not be ideal for non-technical users. Currently, it does not support Power Platform workflow migrations and lacks a pause function—offering only start or stop options during migration.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
It feels good for our techs who already used VMware on prem. However, there was significant difficulty adjusting to a new networking model.
Read full review
Workleap
Overall, I am very satisfied with the ShareGate tool, which is used effectively for migration purposes, not only to migrate the contents from SharePoint to SharePoint but also to the contents from file share to SharePoint. This tool helps us review the warnings/errors from the migrations quickly and helps us identify what caused the errors. I hope the ShareGate product team will consider migration of power automated workflows using this tool in future releases.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Workleap
The tool is generally very reliable, with minimal downtime or unplanned outages. It performs consistently during migrations and administrative tasks, and users rarely encounter critical application errors.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Workleap
In most cases, ShareGate performs well—pages load quickly, and reports are generated in a reasonable timeframe, even for moderately complex environments. Its interface is responsive, and it handles standard migrations and administrative tasks efficiently. However, performance can slow down during very large migrations or when processing high volumes of data, especially if the source or destination environments are heavily customized
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Workleap
Haven't needed it that many times. But they respond very fast and are knowledgeable. They are easy to reach!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Workleap
You only need some global admin consent after that you can do almost anything which is available in the app.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
It's very good compared to its competitors as great uptime, easy support and interactive User Interface makes it a wonderful solution.
Read full review
Workleap
Cost prohibitive since it's based on size migrated and rather expensive. However, the feature-set is VERY good and has some things ShareGate doesn't.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Workleap
ShareGate scales well across departments and sites, supporting large migrations and tenant moves with strong Microsoft 365 integration. However, it lacks advanced automation, Power Platform support, and pause/resume functionality, which can limit its effectiveness in highly complex or enterprise-scale environments.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Cost Savings: One of the key benefits of AVS is that it can help businesses save money by reducing the costs associated with maintaining and upgrading on-premises infrastructure.
  • AVS can help businesses improve their agility by enabling them to quickly provision and scale VMware workloads in Azure.
Read full review
Workleap
  • Share gate has saved my colleagues and I hundreds of hours of migration headaches
  • Share Gates reporting tools as an administrator make my job very very simple.
  • The ROI could be measured alone in man hours saved migrating environments. That alone has probably paid for the licensing cost
Read full review
ScreenShots

ShareGate Screenshots

Screenshot of the ShareGate migration tool – from migration to content management, it is used to migrate to Microsoft 365, move channels in Teams, and merge tenants.Screenshot of the Permissions Matrix Report used to validate, monitor and manage permissions for internal and external users. It is also used to audit permissions security without scripting, or update permissions in bulk.Screenshot of the built-in and custom reports that offer an overview of SharePoint and Teams inventory. They display what exists, and who created it.Screenshot of the team management interface, used to manage a SharePoint team and communication sites without PowerShell scripts. It is also used to build governance policies, and automatically spot risks, gaps and clutter.Screenshot of a display of who can do what in the SharePoint environment. From the interface, users can copy and edit permissions in bulk, control and review external sharing and guest access, or delegate control to owners to review, without leaving Teams.Screenshot of the interface where users can provision their workspaces using templates, with guardrails in place – like minimum owners, blueprint sites, naming conventions, multiple approvers, and privacy level.