Beamery vs. Infor Talent Science

Well suited for organizations that are tracked and managing large amounts of candidates across open roles. They have really improved the overall product and it has a lot fewer technical issues, so big or small companies could find it useful.

Incentivized

I would recommend Infor Talent Science to other colleagues, particularly those working in structured hiring environments. The platform is great at using behavioral science to improve hiring quality and predict potential outcomes. It has become a valuable tool for our business to help align candidates with roles based on proven success rather than just the interviewers intuition alone.

Incentivized

• Beamery is a solid ATS system that simplifies the outreach process.
• It allows the user to customize a ton of their stages and workflows, to make it highly specific to the company/user's needs.

Incentivized

• Provides predictive behavioral outcomes
• Personalize Interview Questions
• Provides Recommendations
• Allows personalized profile creation

Incentivized

• The Chrome Extension could really use some work: very buggy and it's pretty common for candidates that are already in our system to not show up as such in the Extension.
• The internal searching features are limited: we have a massive database that is really hard to access.

Incentivized

• Integration with other hiring platforms
• Assessment can be a deterrent to potential candidates
• User navigation and troubleshooting

Incentivized

The platform is well-designed for recruiting and provides detail and actionable insights, but there is a learning curve that prevents it from being completely intuitive out of the gate.
From a recruiter’s perspective, the core functionality is strong and reliable. Candidate scorecards, behavioral insights, and interview guides are easy to access once you’re familiar with the system, and the data is presented in a way that supports informed decision-making rather than overwhelming users.
The reason for the slightly lower score is that navigation and setup can take time to fully understand, particularly for new users or hiring managers who don’t use the system daily. Some workflows require multiple steps, and certain reports or features are not immediately obvious without training or prior experience.

Incentivized

You can sometimes get bounced around from person to person. Tickets can take some time to get looked over by Engineering.

Incentivized

I have used and evaluated several other talent assessment and hiring platforms, including tools focused on behavioral assessments, personality testing, and skills-based screening. These include solutions similar to Predictive Index–style assessments, generic personality assessments, and ATS-embedded screening tools that offer lighter evaluation capabilities.
Compared to many of these options, Infor Talent Science stands out for its depth of behavioral science and predictive accuracy. While some platforms provide surface-level personality insights or one-size-fits-all assessments, Infor Talent Science benchmarks candidates against actual top performers within the organization, which makes the insights far more relevant and actionable.

Incentivized

• Overall positive, despite the issues, the reason we are still on it is because it does what it is built for well.

Incentivized

• Strong positive impact on our overall business
• Hiring efficiently & helps with decision quality
• Reduces turnover

Incentivized