Beanstalk vs. GitLab

For business or personal applications, where you wish your code to remain private and/or proprietary, Beanstalk could be a good fit. If you are also interested in beginning to automate with relative ease, their tools can be a great help. Code reviews can also be a key factor in the decision, as they provide a good framework for accountability.

Incentivized

One scenario that implements GitLab well in our environment is the ability to use GitLab in conjunction with our Argo runner. We are able to do builds in Jenkins that update specific values in our yaml files in GitLab that are automatically seen and implemented. We keep each environment on a different branch which helps with clarity and pushing stages up to production. We have had issues with other products in the past in trying to make this work as smoothly as it does with GitLab

Incentivized

• Automation
• Code Review
• Support

Incentivized

• GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
• It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
• Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
• Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.

Incentivized

• Interface is not always intuitive, some areas are easier than others to navigate.
• Price plans are a little odd. However, they do seem to be flexible if a plan does not quite fit your needs.

Incentivized

• CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
• Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
• Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.

Incentivized

Gitlab is the best in its segment. They have a free version, they have open-source software, they provide a good service with their SaaS product, they are a fully-remote company since the beginning (which means they are fully distributed and have forward-thinking IMO). I would certainly recommend them to everyone.

Incentivized

I find it easy to use, I haven't had to do the integration work, so that's why it is a 9/10, cause I can't speak to how easy that part was or the initial set up, but day to day use is great!

Incentivized

At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft

Incentivized

If you are creating open source applications, there is almost no reason not to use GitHub. If you do need private repositories (for proprietary or private, business or personal use), Bitbucket could be an excellent solution. Beanstalk's main advantages lie in the support (which is excellent), deployment tools, and code review features.

Incentivized

GitLab is a self-hosted solution when compared with GitHub, but it has all the feature GitLab have. Overall this use case is the same, but I you do not want to store your code on the GitHub server, it is the best solution. Easily manageable but bound to resource restriction. For small teams, I recommend GitHub over Gitlab, but if you have the structure of regular deployment, go with Gitlab.

Incentivized

• Increased automation => better accuracy and efficiency of maintenance/launches
• Better insights into ongoing work and past modifications to code => lower chance of error and more efficient troubleshooting

Incentivized

• GitLab issue management has made release smoother, with about a factor 2 less time used by the relevant person
• The outward facing issue desk now has several hundred public issues answered, and thus alleviates the team, as users can refer to older questions
• Use of CI has made commitment of faulty code drop drastically

Incentivized