BitLocker Drive Encryption vs. Trellix Mobile Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BitLocker
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's BitLocker is an endpoint encryption option.
$100
One Time Fee
McAfee MDP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Mobile sits directly on mobile devices to provide always-on protection no matter how a device is connected—via a corporate network, public access point, or cellular carrier, and even offline. And its machine learning algorithms analyze device behavior deviations to uncover indicators of compromise and accurately identify advanced device, application, and network-based attacks.N/A
Pricing
BitLocker Drive EncryptionTrellix Mobile Security
Editions & Modules
Windows 10 Home
$100.00
One Time Fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitLockerMcAfee MDP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BitLocker Drive EncryptionTrellix Mobile Security
Best Alternatives
BitLocker Drive EncryptionTrellix Mobile Security
Small Businesses
Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender GravityZone
Score 8.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Symantec Encryption
Symantec Encryption
Score 9.9 out of 10
Sophos Mobile
Sophos Mobile
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Trellix Complete Data Protection
Trellix Complete Data Protection
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BitLocker Drive EncryptionTrellix Mobile Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(11 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BitLocker Drive EncryptionTrellix Mobile Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It is well suited especially for users that access or store sensitive/confidential data on their computers. In the case of where users are accessing confidential data over the network, it is highly recommended to use Bitlocker to encrypt the computer. In the case where users are storing confidential data on their computer, it should be a requirement that BitLocker is used/enabled. It would be less appropriate if someone was using a computer and they were not dealing with any sensitive data, or in cases where the computer is used for recreational purposes (browsing the web, playing games, etc).
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
The program really excels at basic mobile protection against malware and viruses. It offers some unique features as its anti-theft application that can help keep mobile devices from being used by unauthorized users. It works well when providing basic security for mobile devices out in the field or in remote work situations. However, it companies may need more extensive or additional security applications to ensure adequate protection
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Encrypts the entire drive and provides a high level of security.
  • In an Active Directory environment, you can set up BitLocker to automatically save keys to AD.
  • As part of Windows, no additional licensing costs.
  • Set up and configuration is relatively easy.
  • Uses TPM module to increase security.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • The program does well with virus and malware scanning abilities.
  • It also has a unique anti-theft feature that can help secure mobile devices.
  • The program offers multiple privacy roles that allows sharing of different levels of access to applications.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Even if it's the best we tested, I think write performance could be improved. Maybe with dedicated hardware inside the TPM?
  • No integration with OS password is a shame as most others have it and it is Microsoft on Microsoft so they can probably do it better then anyone else and safer.
  • I wish they would support multiple passwords like FileVault on macOS. If it's a shared computer, you have to give the only password to Bitlocker to both users.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • The program could use some improvement in its setup and installation process.
  • Another area needing improvement could be its interactive interface.
  • Perhaps a learning tutorial or guide could be added to the application.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Very easy to enable.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Not good nor bad, BitLocker encryption is a symptom of our era, we need to protect ourselves and our data, BitLocker is a tool, as an IT we have to deal with it but it doesn't bring any benefit to my daily operations.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
BitLocker Drive Encryption solution offering is cheaper than the one that McAfee offers, it will help you with specific business concerns like "how many encrypted assets do I have?" it's easy to maintain, easy to deploy, and easy to track. It's best suited for companies that are not trying to go far away on the disk encryption matter
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee Mobile Data Protection offers basic security measures for mobile computing devices without a high cost or extensive training. However, it also may lack some needed features such as data encryption utilized by other products. While its interface is not perfect, it is easier to learn than more feature robust products on the market.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • The biggest positive impact it has on ROI is the cost savings, since there is no cost to using the software.
  • Since it's widely available to anyone with a Windows computer, and the program is built into the operating system, there is no need to really install anything. This helps to save time of the IT department having to do installs, and also keep track of licensing, etc.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • McAfee Mobile Data Protection provides a fairly easy and low cost security measure for providing basic to medium security for mobile devices. While not perfect, it does it basic job fairly well.
  • The program may require a bit of a learning curve for some end users with its interface and installation processes. This may require some additional training or support.
  • The program lacks some of the more advanced data protection abilities found in other competitor products. The result may be a need for additional security applications.
Read full review
ScreenShots