Bitwarden vs. oneSafe

Bitwarden supports various forms of two-factor authentication, including time-based one-time passwords (TOTP), Duo, YubiKey, and other hardware-based tokens. This integration enhances the security of the Bitwarden account and allows to store and manage their 2FA credentials for other applications within Bitwarden itself.

Incentivized

Well suited to password Management and making documents with password protection -- Something that most of their competitors don’t have. You can also have multiple types of passwords (numbers, figures, letters, patterns), which is something nice.

Incentivized

• Pricing
• Transparency
• UX

• Cheaper than the competition.
• Easy to use.
• User-friendly.
• Passwords for documents inside the app is a good service!

Incentivized

• Bitwarden has great functionality all around, however, I would in the future like to see this product as an SSO/IDM distributor.

Incentivized

• It has some features that aren’t useful at all. I mean that there are some features that are not used frequently.
• The Mac prices are a little bit elevated compared with their competition.
• They should do the UI a little bit more formally.

Incentivized

It is more reliable and more user-friendly, and it offers a free version.

Incentivized

I actually use both, but both have different special features. Of course, the password management is the same, but for example, the in-app document password protection of OneSafe is Amazing. I still use both, just as a backup (you never know when an app could fail).

Incentivized

• Enhanced Security - Postive
• Simplified Password Management -Positive
• Negative - Implementation and Adoption Effort: Introducing Bitwarden or any new software solution into an organization requires planning, implementation, and user training

Incentivized

• It helps to keep our passwords safe and in hand when we need them.
• Has reduced calls to IT to recover Passwords.

Incentivized