BlueCat Gateway vs. Indeni

It is well suited for quick manual updates, not too many as the interface could stand an overhaul. Not an easy interface to use when doing research - reverse lookups. Results aren't always accurate. The search capability could be a bit more robust, expanding the search capability into the comments area would help.

Incentivized

This applies to current releases, I guess the next one will be much more comprehensive.

Incentivized

• Deployment capability made easy
• Navigation in the web application
• Organization of objects

Incentivized

• Installation and initial setup.
• Updates.
• Communications and support from developers.
• Looks pretty solid, few bugs.

Incentivized

• Page rendering speed / access of data
• Number of clicks it takes to get to the page you need can be cumbersome
• Feels a bit outdated at times / standard html website interface

Incentivized

• Hardware support.
• Slack integration (not sure if really needed, just because many others have this).
• Universal connector for Linux boxes.

Incentivized

BlueCat is the only DNS manager platform that I've had experience with. We had one prior to this, but it was before I had the need to interact with it doing one of the tasks I do now. I remember the switchover to BlueCat - not everyone was impressed with it, but so far my experience with it has been positive.

Incentivized

Indeni is not a substitution, I guess it can be used for operations support while Cisco Prime does configuration management and PRTG can monitor traffic and/or WAN.

Incentivized

• It has had a great impact on reducing deployment times
• Made my job easier by providing an understandable interface
• Makes day to day tasks easier

Incentivized

• No, I am in the evaluation stage and cannot calculate ROI.
• Indeni can be used to support the implementation of high-scale projects.

Incentivized